Claude Sonnet 5 – benchmark results
Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort), released June 2026, scores 53 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, well above average. It supports text and image input, text output, 1M token context window, and is priced at $0.00 per 1M tokens for both input and output, making it highly competitive.
Artificial Analysis
Anthropic
•
Proprietary model
•
Released June 2026
Claude Sonnet 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis
API Provider Benchmarks
Model summary
IntelligenceUpdated
53
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
4 out of 4 units for Intelligence.
Speed
N/A
Output tokens per second
Unknown out of 4 units for Speed.
Input Price
$0.00
USD per 1M tokens
1 out of 4 units for Input Price.
Output Price
$0.00
USD per 1M tokens
1 out of 4 units for Output Price.
Verbosity
300M
Output tokens from Intelligence Index
4 out of 4 units for Verbosity.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) is amongst the leading models in intelligence and well priced when comparing to other models of similar price. The model supports text and image input, outputs text, and has a 1m tokens context window.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) scores 53 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it well above average among comparable models (averaging 8). When evaluating the Intelligence Index, it generated 300M tokens, which is very verbose in comparison to the average of 37M.
Pricing for Claude Sonnet 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) is $0.00 per 1M input tokens (competitively priced, average: $0.00) and $0.00 per 1M output tokens (competitively priced, average: $0.00).
ReasoningYes
This page shows the reasoning version of this model.
A non-reasoning variant may also exist.
Input modality
Supports: text, image
Output modality
Supports: text
Context window1m
~1500 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font
Metrics are compared against models of the same class:
Non-reasoning models → compared only with other non-reasoning models
Reasoning models → compared across both reasoning and non-reasoning
Open weights models → compared only with other open weights models of the same size class:
Tiny: ≤4B parameters
Small: 4B–40B parameters
Medium: 40B–150B parameters
Large: >150B parameters
Proprietary models → compared across proprietary and open weights models of the same price range, using a blended 3:1 input/output price ratio:
$1 per 1M tokens
Highlights
Updated
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Not currently available
Speed
Output tokens per second · Higher is better
New
Cost per Task
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better
Not currently available
IntelligenceUpdated
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
Not currently available
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
Not currently available
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.
Indicates whether the model weights are available. Models are labelled as 'Commercial Use Restricted' if the weights are available but commercial use is limited (typically requires obtaining a paid license).
Intelligence Breakdown
Intelligence Evaluations
Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better
GDPval-AA v2Updated
Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000
𝜏³-BankingNew
Agentic tool use
Terminal-Bench v2.1New
Agentic coding & terminal use
SciCode
Coding
Humanity's Last Exam
Reasoning & knowledge
GPQA Diamond
Scientific reasoning
CritPt
Physics reasoning
AA-Omniscience Accuracy
Knowledge
AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate
1 - hallucination rate
AA-LCR
Long context reasoning
AA-BriefcaseNew
Agentic knowledge work, (Elo-500)/2000
IFBench
Instruction following
APEX-Agents-AA
Long-horizon agentic tasks
ITBench-AA
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
MMMU-Pro
Visual reasoning
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon.
While model intelligence generally translates across use cases, specific evaluations may be more relevant for certain use cases.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.
AA-BriefcaseNew
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Briefcase is an agentic knowledge work benchmark developed by Artificial Analysis. AA-Briefcase Elo is a combined metric that aggregates rubric pass rate, analytical quality Elo and presentation Elo · Higher is better
Not currently available
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon
AA-Briefcase Elo is a combined metric that aggregates analytical quality Elo, presentation Elo, and rubric pass rate, with rubric performance converted into Elo via synthetic head-to-head matches. Elo and 95% confidence interval bounds are clamped at 0.
Openness
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Openness Index assesses model openness on a 0 to 100 normalized scale (higher is more open)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon
Intelligence Index Comparisons
Intelligence vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon.
Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.
Token UseUpdated
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
Weighted average number of output tokens used to run one task in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon
The number of tokens required per Intelligence Index task. This is calculated by multiplying the output tokens per eval by the relative weights of each benchmark in the Intelligence Index, then dividing by task count (excluding repeats).
Price and CostUpdated
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon
Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon
The cost to run the evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, calculated using the model's input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices and the number of tokens used across evaluations (excluding repeats).
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Price (USD per M Tokens)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon
Price per token for cached prompts (previously processed), typically offering a significant discount compared to regular input price, represented as USD per million tokens. The values shown here are the cache hit price; cache write and cache storage are billed separately and vary by provider — see "Cache pricing by provider" for detail.
Price per token included in the request/message sent to the API, represented as USD per million Tokens.
The blended cache price shown here uses cache hit price only. Other caching costs differ by provider:
Anthropic: charges a separate cache write fee, with different rates for 5-minute and 1-hour TTLs (1-hour TTL is more expensive).
Google (Vertex/Gemini): charges a per-hour cache storage fee in addition to cache hit pricing. Some providers also use tiered pricing for prompts above 200K tokens.
OpenAI, DeepSeek, others: typically charge only cache hit pricing with no write or storage fee.
See Prompt Caching for the full breakdown.
Price per token generated by the model (received from the API), represented as USD per million Tokens.
Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).
Context Window
Context Window
Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon
Larger context windows are relevant to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) LLM workflows which typically involve reasoning and information retrieval of large amounts of data.
Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).
SpeedUpdated
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed
Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon
Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).
Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Weighted average wall clock time (minutes) per task; excludes TTFT and execution time · Lower is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon
The weighted average time (seconds) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task. This is calculated by dividing output tokens per task by output speed, weighted by the relative weights of each benchmark in the Intelligence Index.
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon
Time to first answer token received, in seconds, after API request sent. For reasoning models, this includes the 'thinking' time of the model before providing an answer. For models which do not support streaming, this represents time to receive the completion.
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon
Seconds to receive a 500 token response. Key components:
Input time: Time to receive the first response token
Thinking time (only for reasoning models): Time reasoning models spend outputting tokens to reason prior to providing an answer. Amount of tokens
[truncated for AI cost control]