跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:ChartProbe: A Diagnostic Study on Visual Reasoning through Perception, Grounding, and Simple Reasoning

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2608.13766v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) remain unreliable on chart questions that require reasoning over visual quantities, and this weakness is usually attributed to a reasoning deficit and addressed with more reasoning supervision. We ask whether the difficulty lies in reasoning itself, or in the simpler skills that reasoning operates on: reading the plotted elements (\emph{perception}), locating them and binding them to their labels (\emph{grounding}), and performing single-step computations such as ranking, totals, and differences (\emph{simple reasoning}). We introduce \textbf{ChartProbe}, a diagnostic framework whose probes are generated directly from the code that renders each chart, so every gold answer is exact by…

來源arXiv Computer Vision作者: Mahsa Khoshnoodi, Sarah Adel Bargal
待翻譯:ChartProbe: A Diagnostic Study on Visual Reasoning through Perception, Grounding, and Simple Reasoning
報告錯誤

更正渠道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

--> [Submitted on 13 Aug 2026] Title:ChartProbe: A Diagnostic Study on Visual Reasoning through Perception, Grounding, and Simple Reasoning View a PDF of the paper titled ChartProbe: A Diagnostic Study on Visual Reasoning through Perception, Grounding, and Simple Reasoning, by Mahsa Khoshnoodi and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Vision-language models (VLMs) remain unreliable on chart questions that require reasoning over visual quantities, and this weakness is usually attributed to a reasoning deficit and addressed with more reasoning supervision. We ask whether the difficulty lies in reasoning itself, or in the simpler skills that reasoning operates on: reading the plotted elements (\emph{perception}), locating them and binding them to their labels (\emph{grounding}), and performing single-step computations such as ranking, totals, and differences (\emph{simple reasoning}). We introduce \textbf{ChartProbe}, a diagnostic framework whose probes are generated directly from the code that renders each chart, so every gold answer is exact by construction, needs no human annotation, and attributes each failure to a single skill. ChartProbe enables an intervention prior work does not attempt: instead of synthesizing complex-reasoning data, we withhold complex questions and reasoning traces entirely, fine-tune on one simple skill at a time, and measure transfer to held-out complex-reasoning questions. Across three open-weight VLMs, supervising the simpler skills alone produces large gains on complex-reasoning questions the model never trained on: where these skills are weak and the model can be taught to read the image, training them recovers much of complex reasoning at no reasoning-data cost. The gains hold across three out-of-distribution settings: an unseen chart type (pie charts), a human-written benchmark disjoint from our images and templates (ChartQA), and a non-chart visual domain (CLEVR). Complex visual reasoning can therefore improve without complex-reasoning supervision. Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) Cite as: arXiv:2608.13766 [cs.CV] (or arXiv:2608.13766v1 [cs.CV] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.13766 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Mahsa Khoshnoodi [view email] [v1] Thu, 13 Aug 2026 20:44:57 UTC (3,147 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled ChartProbe: A Diagnostic Study on Visual Reasoning through Perception, Grounding, and Simple Reasoning, by Mahsa Khoshnoodi and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CV new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

工程師進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級元數據。
  • arXiv:2608.13766v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) remain unreliable on chart questions that require reasoning over visual quantities, and this weakness…

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。