本文にスキップ
AI News HubLIVE
原典の内容 · 翻訳・分析待ち3 分で読了

翻訳待ち:Characterizing a Configuration Where Inference-Time PRM-Pruned Fragment Grafting Is Inert: Evidence from Three Reasoning LMs

記事の要約

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。ソース概要:arXiv:2610.00047v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diversity collapse in parallel chain-of-thought has motivated inference-time interventions built on a natural design: when a process reward model (PRM) prunes a chain, its high-PRM prefix is extracted and grafted verbatim as an in-context demonstration into a still-decoding sibling. We isolate this mechanism, PRM-Pruned Fragment Grafting (PPFG), as the most cost-minimal operationalization of cross-trajectory step-level transfer, and test it at the operating point where prior fragment-grafting work reports gains only under additional compensating ingredients. On Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct with Math-Shepherd on full MATH500 (n=500, three seeds), PPFG in both stagnation- and random-targeting variants is statisti…

ソースarXiv AI著者: Khawaja Murad ul Hassan, Mehran Ebrahimi
翻訳待ち:Characterizing a Configuration Where Inference-Time PRM-Pruned Fragment Grafting Is Inert: Evidence from Three Reasoning LMs
誤りを報告

訂正窓口はまだ利用できません。記事情報をコピーして保存できます。

訂正案内
本文へ

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。

[Submitted on 3 Sep 2026] Title:Characterizing a Configuration Where Inference-Time PRM-Pruned Fragment Grafting Is Inert: Evidence from Three Reasoning LMs View a PDF of the paper titled Characterizing a Configuration Where Inference-Time PRM-Pruned Fragment Grafting Is Inert: Evidence from Three Reasoning LMs, by Khawaja Murad ul Hassan and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Diversity collapse in parallel chain-of-thought has motivated inference-time interventions built on a natural design: when a process reward model (PRM) prunes a chain, its high-PRM prefix is extracted and grafted verbatim as an in-context demonstration into a still-decoding sibling. We isolate this mechanism, PRM-Pruned Fragment Grafting (PPFG), as the most cost-minimal operationalization of cross-trajectory step-level transfer, and test it at the operating point where prior fragment-grafting work reports gains only under additional compensating ingredients. On Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct with Math-Shepherd on full MATH500 (n=500, three seeds), PPFG in both stagnation- and random-targeting variants is statistically indistinguishable from an independent parallel-CoT baseline on every measured axis. We characterize why: a four-bucket classification of 322 stagnation-rule injection events shows only 14% targeted a genuinely struggling chain; the rest landed on chains that had already succeeded, were near completion, or sat on a flat PRM plateau, states a rescue graft cannot change. No compound-gate refinement jointly achieves well-targeted firing and adequate density, and a random control matches the same parity at 2.4x the firing rate, so the inertness is not heuristic-specific. The finding replicates across three base LMs, six benchmarks, a second PRM, and a compatibility-gate sweep; two-one-sided-tests analysis promotes the parity to positive equivalence on all twelve Qwen/LLaMA cells. A per-event spot-check finds injected chains prune at 2.75x the matched-step rate, but a surviving-sibling counterfactual finds no population-level compensation. A hindsight oracle bounds any per-problem gain from choosing PPFG over independent at +0.13 pp. We contribute an equivalence-testing template for establishing inference-time mechanism nulls, with every claim scoped to its tested operating point. Comments: 24 pages, 4 figures, 22 tables Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL) Cite as: arXiv:2610.00047 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2610.00047v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00047 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Khawaja Murad Ul Hassan [view email] [v1] Thu, 3 Sep 2026 11:06:07 UTC (117 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Characterizing a Configuration Where Inference-Time PRM-Pruned Fragment Grafting Is Inert: Evidence from Three Reasoning LMs, by Khawaja Murad ul Hassan and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs cs.CL References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

要点と分析を開く

記事インテリジェンス

エンジニア上級

要点

  • AI 生成が一時的に利用できないため、ソース内容とフォールバックメタデータを保存しました。
  • arXiv:2610.00047v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diversity collapse in parallel chain-of-thought has motivated inference-time interventions built on a natural design: when a proces…

要点と分析は自動生成され、誤りを含む場合があります。原典をご確認ください。