AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

CaRE Compute-aware Remasking Evaluation Protocol for Masked Diffusion Language Models

CaRE introduces a standardized evaluation framework for comparing remasking strategies in masked diffusion language models (MDLMs). By standardizing the actual number of function evaluations (NFE), enforcing multi-metric reporting, and explicitly controlling stochasticity, CaRE reveals that temperature explains most MAUVE variance, compute-matched comparisons reverse several published strategy rankings, and informed remasking trades off with stochastic unmasking. High-entropy remasking reduces MAUVE by 0.296 at 256 steps at unmask_temp=0.25 (p=0.020). A leaderboard covering 12 open-weight MDLMs confirms these findings across architectures and scales.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Yash Shah, Abhijit Chakraborty, Vivek Gupta

-->

[Submitted on 4 Jun 2026]

Title:CaRE Compute-aware Remasking Evaluation Protocol for Masked Diffusion Language Models

View a PDF of the paper titled CaRE Compute-aware Remasking Evaluation Protocol for Masked Diffusion Language Models, by Yash Shah and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Masked diffusion language models (MDLMs) are advancing rapidly, yet the evaluation standards needed to reliably interpret their progress have not kept pace. Despite MDLMs becoming competitive with autoregressive language models, seven recent remasking papers evaluate under incompatible settings, varying nominal step counts, metrics, and sampling temperatures without jointly controlling these factors, rendering their strategy rankings largely incomparable and leaving open whether reported gains reflect algorithmic improvements or evaluation artifacts. We present CaRE, a compute-aware evaluation framework that audits MDLM remasking strategies by standardizing actual number of function evaluations (NFE), enforcing multi-metric reporting, and explicitly controlling stochasticity. Applied to 7 remasking strategies across LLaDA-8B-Base and Dream-7B-Base at 4 stochasticity levels and 3 step budgets on OpenWebText and LM1B, CaRE reveals that: (i) temperature explains the majority of MAUVE variance, (ii) compute-matched comparisons reverse several published strategy rankings, and (iii) informed remasking and stochastic unmasking are in tension, with high-entropy remasking reducing MAUVE by 0.296 at 256 steps at unmask_temp=0.25 (p=0.020). A CaRE leaderboard covering 12 open-weight MDLMs (150M to 8B parameters) shows that this interaction direction holds across architectures and scales. These findings demonstrate that current MDLM evaluations can systematically conflate algorithmic improvements with hidden choices of compute and stochasticity. We release the evaluation protocol, implementation, and leaderboard to ensure future remasking claims are reproducible and comparable.

Comments: updated version

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.24763 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2607.24763v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.24763

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Abhijit Chakraborty [view email] [v1] Thu, 4 Jun 2026 22:21:08 UTC (1,073 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled CaRE Compute-aware Remasking Evaluation Protocol for Masked Diffusion Language Models, by Yash Shah and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)