Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Capacity, Responsiveness and Alignment: What Makes a Latent Structure Actionable

Summary

arXiv:2610.06897v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Localizing latent structures in the activation space of language models (LMs) is central to understanding and controlling their behavior. Yet, localized structures can differ substantially in their causal influence, raising the question of what makes a structure actionable. We tackle this question by casting causal influence as a product of three factors and showing empirically that they act as interpretable, distinct constraints: capacity, measuring the sensitivity of the model's output to movement along the structure, responsiveness, capturing how promotable the concept is given the current context, and alignment, reflecting how well the structure aligns with the context-specific representation of the concept. Across 4 LM families and 50 c…

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Or Shafran, Mor Geva
Capacity, Responsiveness and Alignment: What Makes a Latent Structure Actionable
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 28 Sep 2026]

Title:Capacity, Responsiveness and Alignment: What Makes a Latent Structure Actionable

View a PDF of the paper titled Capacity, Responsiveness and Alignment: What Makes a Latent Structure Actionable, by Or Shafran and 1 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Localizing latent structures in the activation space of language models (LMs) is central to understanding and controlling their behavior. Yet, localized structures can differ substantially in their causal influence, raising the question of what makes a structure actionable. We tackle this question by casting causal influence as a product of three factors and showing empirically that they act as interpretable, distinct constraints: capacity, measuring the sensitivity of the model's output to movement along the structure, responsiveness, capturing how promotable the concept is given the current context, and alignment, reflecting how well the structure aligns with the context-specific representation of the concept. Across 4 LM families and 50 concepts, we observe that causal effectiveness requires all factors to be high; low capacity and responsiveness reduce it by 84% and 95%, respectively, while low alignment can reverse it, suppressing concept expression. Moreover, we find that causality is context-dependent rather than an intrinsic property of the structure, with causally effective directions forming a low-dimensional subspace that varies across contexts. By restricting the training of linear probes to this subspace, we introduce causal probes that achieve 17%-118% improvement in steering across models, with only 3% reduction in concept detection.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.06897 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.06897v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.06897

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Or Shafran [view email] [v1] Mon, 28 Sep 2026 17:57:46 UTC (835 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Capacity, Responsiveness and Alignment: What Makes a Latent Structure Actionable, by Or Shafran and 1 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.06897v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Localizing latent structures in the activation space of language models (LMs) is central to understanding and controlling their beh…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.