AI News HubLIVE
原文

Can AI Guess What You Know? Performance Comparison of Large Language Models for Human Domain Knowledge Estimation From Communication Logs

This study evaluates seven LLMs (including Gemini, Claude, and GPT families) on inferring individual domain knowledge from long-term Slack logs. Using 27,188 messages from 43 users, zero-shot estimates were compared with self-reported skill ratings from 27 participants. Gemini 2.5 Flash achieved the lowest error (MAE 21.13%), while GPT models showed larger discrepancies. Accuracy depends weakly on message volume, highlighting limits and the need for privacy-aware deployments and richer knowledge representations.

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Employees often struggle to identify expertise, causing productivity loss
  • Gemini 2.5 Flash achieved lowest MAE of 21.13% in zero-shot inference
  • Estimation accuracy only weakly correlated with message quantity
  • Findings underscore feasibility and need for privacy-preserving methods

Why it matters

This matters because employees often struggle to identify expertise, causing productivity loss.

Technical impact

May affect model selection, inference cost, product capability, and evaluation benchmarks.

[2605.22971] Can AI Guess What You Know? Performance Comparison of Large Language Models for Human Domain Knowledge Estimation From Communication Logs

[Submitted on 21 May 2026]

Title:Can AI Guess What You Know? Performance Comparison of Large Language Models for Human Domain Knowledge Estimation From Communication Logs

View a PDF of the paper titled Can AI Guess What You Know? Performance Comparison of Large Language Models for Human Domain Knowledge Estimation From Communication Logs, by Ko Watanabe and 1 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Employees often struggle to identify ``who knows what,'' leading to organizational productivity losses. We investigate whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can infer individual domain knowledge directly from long-term Slack logs. Analyzing 27,188 messages from 43 users, we evaluated seven models (including Gemini, Claude, and GPT families) by comparing their zero-shot estimates against self-reported skill ratings from 27 participants. Gemini 2.5 Flash achieved the lowest error (MAE 21.13%), while GPT models showed significantly larger discrepancies. Notably, estimation accuracy depended only weakly on message volume, indicating that more text alone does not guarantee better inference. These findings demonstrate the feasibility and current limits of automated expertise mapping, highlighting the need for privacy-preserving deployments and richer, structure-aware representations of human knowledge.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.22971 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.22971v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.22971

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Ko Watanabe [view email] [v1] Thu, 21 May 2026 19:01:16 UTC (3,790 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Can AI Guess What You Know? Performance Comparison of Large Language Models for Human Domain Knowledge Estimation From Communication Logs, by Ko Watanabe and 1 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.HC

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)