Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

CaMeWM: A Causal Medical World Model for Generative Tumor Evolution and Treatment Planning

Summary

arXiv:2610.26923v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Treatment planning is intrinsically counterfactual: clinicians must compare how a patient's tumor and survival would evolve under competing regimens, whereas a retrospective cohort records only the regimen received and one follow-up scan. A treatment-conditioned generator trained on such data can therefore reproduce historical treatment allocation rather than simulate the interventional disease dynamics needed to rank regimens. We introduce \textbf{CaMeWM}, a causal medical world model for supported post-TACE tumor evolution and treatment planning. CaMeWM implements one intervention-to-decision loop rather than three independent prediction tasks: it first admits a queried regimen only for clinically comparable histories with empirical treatm…

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Huanlong Gao, Xuelei He, Fengjun Zhao, Xiaowei He
CaMeWM: A Causal Medical World Model for Generative Tumor Evolution and Treatment Planning
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 17 Oct 2026]

Title:CaMeWM: A Causal Medical World Model for Generative Tumor Evolution and Treatment Planning

View a PDF of the paper titled CaMeWM: A Causal Medical World Model for Generative Tumor Evolution and Treatment Planning, by Huanlong Gao and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Treatment planning is intrinsically counterfactual: clinicians must compare how a patient's tumor and survival would evolve under competing regimens, whereas a retrospective cohort records only the regimen received and one follow-up scan. A treatment-conditioned generator trained on such data can therefore reproduce historical treatment allocation rather than simulate the interventional disease dynamics needed to rank regimens. We introduce \textbf{CaMeWM}, a causal medical world model for supported post-TACE tumor evolution and treatment planning. CaMeWM implements one intervention-to-decision loop rather than three independent prediction tasks: it first admits a queried regimen only for clinically comparable histories with empirical treatment support; it then generates a distribution of lesion-local follow-up worlds through an action-conditioned response descriptor, deterministic anchor, and residual 3D diffusion transition; and it finally maps sampled worlds to restricted mean survival time (RMST) with a response-Cox utility model. Under pre-treatment adjustment and positivity, this loop estimates a prespecified, support-restricted g-formula target; all selection and nuisance estimation are fold-local, and the induced policy is evaluated by cross-fitted, censoring-adjusted doubly robust estimation. Across 79 paired out-of-fold episodes, CaMeWM achieves 0.618 SSIM and 0.528 change-map SSIM for follow-up CT transition, while its generated-world survival pathway attains a 0.615 C-index; factual-only AIPW estimates a 9.60-week RMST gain (95\% CI 0.61--18.13) for the frozen policy. CaMeWM provides an inspectable basis for retrospective, support-restricted treatment planning.

Comments: 30 pages,8 figures,12 tables,including supplementary material

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.26923 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2610.26923v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.26923

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Huanlong Gao [view email] [v1] Sat, 17 Oct 2026 11:53:00 UTC (5,390 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled CaMeWM: A Causal Medical World Model for Generative Tumor Evolution and Treatment Planning, by Huanlong Gao and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.LG

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.26923v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Treatment planning is intrinsically counterfactual: clinicians must compare how a patient's tumor and survival would evolve under c…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.