Blind Listening Tests of Hearing Aids at Scale
HearAdvisor released a large-scale dataset of 151,608 listener ratings on ease of speech understanding for commercial hearing aids, and developed a predictive model using Whisper encoder that significantly outperforms HASPIv2.
[2606.26342] A Large-Scale Database and Predictive Model of Listener-Rated Ease of Speech Understanding in Commercial Hearing Aids
[Submitted on 24 Jun 2026]
Title:A Large-Scale Database and Predictive Model of Listener-Rated Ease of Speech Understanding in Commercial Hearing Aids
View a PDF of the paper titled A Large-Scale Database and Predictive Model of Listener-Rated Ease of Speech Understanding in Commercial Hearing Aids, by Andrew Sabin and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:HearAdvisor aims to provide hearing-aid consumers with audio-performance metrics and recordings that reflect real listening experience. For speech-related metrics, HearAdvisor has historically used HASPIv2, a metric designed to predict objective intelligibility and validated primarily under simulated distortions. Its relationship to consumer-rated ease of understanding for commercial hearing aids is uncertain. Here we introduce a large-scale perceptual dataset and learned metric for listener-rated perceived benefit for speech understanding. Website visitors with self-reported hearing loss completed a blind, MUSHRA-inspired listening test in which they rated recordings of commercial hearing aids on a five-point "Ease of Understanding" scale. The dataset contains 151,608 ratings, 104,298 after quality screening, spanning 10,394 binaural acoustic-manikin recordings from 83 commercial products across 72 realistic acoustic scenes. To predict these ratings, we pass aided audio and a matched clean-speech reference through a frozen Whisper encoder, subtract their internal representations, and train a small MLP head on the resulting difference embedding. On devices held out of training, the learned metric substantially outperforms HASPIv2 at the scene level (overall r = 0.92 vs. 0.83; loud = 0.89 vs. 0.75; quiet = 0.79 vs. 0.58). In loud scenes, performance reaches the split-half reliability of the listener ratings; in quiet scenes, it approaches that ceiling. The model also responds sensibly to controlled gain and SNR manipulations. Together, the dataset and model provide a new way to predict listener-rated ease of speech understanding for real commercial hearing-aid recordings.
Comments: 6 pages, 3 figures
Subjects:
Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.26342 [eess.AS]
(or arXiv:2606.26342v1 [eess.AS] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.26342
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Andrew Sabin [view email] [v1] Wed, 24 Jun 2026 19:34:56 UTC (117 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled A Large-Scale Database and Predictive Model of Listener-Rated Ease of Speech Understanding in Commercial Hearing Aids, by Andrew Sabin and 2 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
eess.AS
new | recent | 2026-06
Change to browse by:
eess
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)