Black-Box Inference of LLM Architectural Properties with Restrictive API Access
A new attack called NightVision can estimate hidden dimension, depth, and parameter count of LLMs even when APIs are restricted to only single logit output, achieving low error rates.
-->
[Submitted on 1 Jul 2026]
Title:Black-Box Inference of LLM Architectural Properties with Restrictive API Access
View a PDF of the paper titled Black-Box Inference of LLM Architectural Properties with Restrictive API Access, by Christopher Ellis and 5 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:In practice, most commercial LLM providers do not publicly release details of underlying LLM architectures. However, prior work has shown that given limited API access to an LLM (namely, top-$k$ logits and/or a logit bias function), one can recover certain architectural details of an LLM, such as the hidden dimension of the feed-forward network. Perhaps in response to these results, most commercial LLM providers have restricted their APIs to expose only the single logit for each decoded token, and they no longer give users the ability to bias logits. We show that even under current restrictive APIs, several architectural parameters are still recoverable. We present NightVision, an attack that uses restrictive black-box API access to estimate the hidden dimension, depth, and parameter count of an LLM. Algorithmically, NightVision relies on a novel common set prompting technique in which multiple prompts expose log probabilities for the same set of output tokens; a spectral analysis of these results is used to infer hidden dimension. NightVision additionally uses end-to-end time to first token (TTFT) measurements and the estimated hidden dimension to estimate depth and parameter count. We empirically evaluate NightVision on 32 open-source LLMs, recovering hidden dimension to within 23% average relative error across all models (9% on MoE models), and depth and parameter count to within 53% for models exceeding three billion parameters. We run extensive ablations to demonstrate how these accuracies scale with token budget and model properties. Overall, our results suggest that current LLM APIs are not sufficiently restricted to fully obfuscate the architectural details of their underlying models.
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.01313 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2607.01313v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.01313
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Shreyas Chaudhari [view email] [v1] Wed, 1 Jul 2026 17:53:10 UTC (5,581 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Black-Box Inference of LLM Architectural Properties with Restrictive API Access, by Christopher Ellis and 5 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.LG
new | recent | 2026-07
Change to browse by:
cs cs.AI cs.CL cs.CR
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)