AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Beyond Shapley: An Influence-Based Data Auditing Pipeline for LLM Alignment and Evaluation

Introduces a scalable, inference-only data valuation pipeline that approximates Shapley values without iterative retraining. Using semantic k-NN graphs and log-likelihood shifts, it evaluates data utility. Applied to HelpSteer2 and HH-RLHF, it reduces manual audit space by 99.1% and uncovers thousands of hidden preference inversions, revealing flaws in human ground-truth labels.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Yunting Song, Matthew Watson, Peter Grabowski, Jun Qin

-->

[Submitted on 24 Jul 2026]

Title:Beyond Shapley: An Influence-Based Data Auditing Pipeline for LLM Alignment and Evaluation

View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond Shapley: An Influence-Based Data Auditing Pipeline for LLM Alignment and Evaluation, by Yunting Song and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:The alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) is increasingly bottlenecked by data quality. As datasets scale, massive preference and instruction-tuning corpora inevitably accumulate hidden structural contradictions, safety risks, and systemic human annotation errors. Standard dataset auditing methods, such as semantic deduplication or LLM-as-a-judge, struggle to capture the actual predictive impact of individual records and often miss deep functional rule clashes. To address this, we introduce a scalable, inference-only data valuation pipeline that approximates the Shapley value without iterative model retraining. By mapping semantic k-NN neighborhoods into a directed graph, our framework evaluates data utility directly through a reference LLM's probability distribution using zero-shot and one-shot conditional log-likelihood shifts. Our pipeline then translates these predictive influence scores into localized advantage metrics to isolate gradient-conflicting records. We demonstrate the pipeline's efficacy in sanitizing two heavily vetted alignment datasets. First, applying our pipeline to the HelpSteer2 dataset reduced the manual audit search space by 99.1%, successfully uncovering falsely-labeled records across diverse failure modes. Second, applying our automated audit strategy to Anthropic's HH-RLHF training and evaluation splits identified thousands of hidden safety and factual preference inversions. Crucially, by extending this audit to the evaluation split, we expose severe vulnerabilities in current benchmark integrity: highly capable models frequently predict the safer or more helpful response, only to be penalized by objectively flawed human ground-truth labels. Overall, our work provides a mathematically grounded, highly efficient diagnostic tool to uncover human label failures, sanitize evaluation benchmarks, and ensure the integrity of LLM alignment data.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.22766 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2607.22766v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.22766

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Yunting Song [view email] [v1] Fri, 24 Jul 2026 03:31:44 UTC (144 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond Shapley: An Influence-Based Data Auditing Pipeline for LLM Alignment and Evaluation, by Yunting Song and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)