Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Beyond Binary Verifiable Rewards: Behavioral Self-Rewarding for SWE Agents

Summary

arXiv:2610.12598v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) provides reliable supervision for software engineering agents through executable tests, but binary rewards fail to distinguish trajectories with substantially different debugging quality. We investigate whether the current policy can judge its own trajectories and use these judgments to improve task performance without a separately trained reward model. To this end, we introduce Behavioral Self-Rewarding (BSR), a reward-refinement method that reuses the policy to compare observable debugging behavior among trajectories from the same task with the same verifier outcome. BSR aggregates pairwise preferences into task-local scores and converts them into bounded auxiliary rewards, introducing…

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Yiran Wu, Andrew Zhao, Yurui Chang, Qingyun Wu, Xuan Feng
Beyond Binary Verifiable Rewards: Behavioral Self-Rewarding for SWE Agents
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 8 Oct 2026]

Title:Beyond Binary Verifiable Rewards: Behavioral Self-Rewarding for SWE Agents

View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond Binary Verifiable Rewards: Behavioral Self-Rewarding for SWE Agents, by Yiran Wu and 4 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) provides reliable supervision for software engineering agents through executable tests, but binary rewards fail to distinguish trajectories with substantially different debugging quality. We investigate whether the current policy can judge its own trajectories and use these judgments to improve task performance without a separately trained reward model. To this end, we introduce Behavioral Self-Rewarding (BSR), a reward-refinement method that reuses the policy to compare observable debugging behavior among trajectories from the same task with the same verifier outcome. BSR aggregates pairwise preferences into task-local scores and converts them into bounded auxiliary rewards, introducing reward contrast while preserving the verifier-defined pass/fail ordering. This provides additional supervision from already-collected trajectories without requiring new environment interactions. Experiments on SWE-bench Verified and SWE-bench-Live show consistent improvements across the evaluated Qwen3-14B and Qwen3-32B configurations, supporting using the policy's own comparative judgments as a complementary learning signal for training software engineering agents.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Software Engineering (cs.SE)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.12598 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.12598v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.12598

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Yiran Wu [view email] [v1] Thu, 8 Oct 2026 18:21:10 UTC (591 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond Binary Verifiable Rewards: Behavioral Self-Rewarding for SWE Agents, by Yiran Wu and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.SE

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.12598v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) provides reliable supervision for software engineering agents through executa…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.