Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source3 min read

Benchmarking Local Language Models for Social Robots using Edge Devices

Summary

This study benchmarks 25 open-source language models for local deployment on edge hardware, evaluating inference efficiency, general knowledge, and teaching effectiveness. Results show pronounced trade-offs: throughput and energy efficiency vary by over an order of magnitude, MMLU accuracy ranges from near-random to 57.2%, and teaching effectiveness does not correlate monotonically with either metric. Granite4 Tiny Hybrid (7B) achieves a strong overall balance, and a three-tier local inference architecture is proposed for the Robot Study Companion.

SourcearXiv RoboticsAuthor: Dorian Lamouille, Matev\v{z} B. Zorec, Farnaz Baksh, Karl Kruusam\"ae
Benchmarking Local Language Models for Social Robots using Edge Devices
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.03111] Benchmarking Local Language Models for Social Robots using Edge Devices

Skip to main content

Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.

We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate

> cs > arXiv:2605.03111

Help | Advanced Search

All fields Title Author Abstract Comments Journal reference ACM classification MSC classification Report number arXiv identifier DOI ORCID arXiv author ID Help pages Full text

Search

GO

quick links

Login

Help Pages

About

-->

Computer Science > Robotics

arXiv:2605.03111 (cs)

[Submitted on 4 May 2026]

Title:Benchmarking Local Language Models for Social Robots using Edge Devices

Authors:Dorian Lamouille, Matevž B. Zorec, Farnaz Baksh, Karl Kruusamäe

View a PDF of the paper titled Benchmarking Local Language Models for Social Robots using Edge Devices, by Dorian Lamouille and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Social-educational robots designed for socially interactive pedagogical support, such as the Robot Study Companion (RSC), rely on responsive, privacy-preserving interaction despite severely limited compute. However, there is a gap in systematic benchmarking of language models for edge computing in pedagogical applications. This paper benchmarks 25 open-source language models for local deployment on edge hardware. We evaluate each model across three dimensions: inference efficiency (tokens per second, energy consumption), general knowledge (a six-category MMLU subset), and teaching effectiveness (LLM-rated pedagogical quality), validated against five independent human raters using the Raspberry Pi(RPi)4 as the primary platform, with additional comparisons on the RPi5 and a laptop GPU.

Results reveal pronounced trade-offs: throughput and energy efficiency vary by over an order of magnitude across models, MMLU accuracy ranges from near-random to 57.2%, and teaching effectiveness does not correlate monotonically with either metric. Among the evaluated models, Granite4 Tiny Hybrid (7B) achieves a strong overall balance, reaching 2.5 tokens per second, 0.90 tokens per joule, and 54.6% MMLU accuracy; high MMLU accuracy does not appear necessary for strong teaching scores. Human validation on four representative models preserved the automated rank ordering (Pearson r = 0.967, n = 4). Based on these findings, we propose a three-tier local inference architecture for the RSC that balances responsiveness and accuracy on resource-constrained hardware.

Comments: Accepted for 22nd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impact (June 2026) in Vienna, Austria

Subjects:

Robotics (cs.RO); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.03111 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2605.03111v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.03111

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Farnaz Baksh [view email] [v1] Mon, 4 May 2026 19:49:22 UTC (317 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Benchmarking Local Language Models for Social Robots using Edge Devices, by Dorian Lamouille and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.RO

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CL

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

About

Help

contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact

subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe

Copyright

Privacy Policy

Web Accessibility Assistance

arXiv Operational Status

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • 25 open-source LLMs benchmarked on edge devices
  • Evaluated on inference efficiency, general knowledge, and teaching effectiveness
  • Granite4 Tiny Hybrid (7B) shows best balance
  • Three-tier inference architecture proposed for RSC

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.