Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Benchmarking Instance-Dependent Label Noise with Controlled Corruptions

Summary

Introduces CILN, a framework to generate instance-dependent label noise via controlled input corruptions, enabling explicit control over ambiguity sources. Demonstrates on CIFAR-10, MNIST, Adult that noise structure impacts algorithm behavior beyond noise rate.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Shadman Islam, Agustinus Kristiadi, Mostafa Milani
Benchmarking Instance-Dependent Label Noise with Controlled Corruptions
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2606.14965] Benchmarking Instance-Dependent Label Noise with Controlled Corruptions

[Submitted on 12 Jun 2026]

Title:Benchmarking Instance-Dependent Label Noise with Controlled Corruptions

View a PDF of the paper titled Benchmarking Instance-Dependent Label Noise with Controlled Corruptions, by Shadman Islam and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Synthetic instance-dependent label noise (IDN) benchmarks are widely used to evaluate noisy-label learning methods, yet existing approaches typically generate noise through imperfect annotators or classifier raters, leaving the source of ambiguity implicit. We introduce CILN, a benchmark generation framework that creates IDN through controlled input corruptions. A diverse voter pool labels corrupted instances, producing benchmark datasets in which both the source and severity of ambiguity are explicit and controllable. Using CIFAR10, MNIST, and Adult, we construct 90 benchmark settings spanning multiple corruption families and severity levels. Our experiments show that the resulting benchmarks exhibit genuine instance-dependent noise, provide diverse confusion structures, and, on CIFAR-10, can produce label distributions that are closer to human uncertainty than an existing synthetic IDN benchmark. We further demonstrate that corruption-mediated IDN can expose failure modes of popular noisy-label learning methods, including Co-Teaching and DivideMix, that are not observed under comparable levels of rater-fallibility noise. These findings suggest that noise structure, not only noise rate, plays an important role in benchmark difficulty and algorithm behavior. By making ambiguity generation explicit and controllable, CILN provides a complementary benchmarking framework for studying noisy-label learning under diverse sources of instance difficulty.

Comments: 12-page conference submission

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Databases (cs.DB)

Cite as: arXiv:2606.14965 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2606.14965v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.14965

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Mostafa Milani [view email] [v1] Fri, 12 Jun 2026 21:30:18 UTC (425 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Benchmarking Instance-Dependent Label Noise with Controlled Corruptions, by Shadman Islam and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-06

Change to browse by:

cs cs.DB

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

ResearchersAdvanced

Key points

  • CILN generates IDN through controlled corruptions, making ambiguity explicit.
  • 90 benchmark settings across multiple datasets and corruption types.
  • Corruption-mediated IDN reveals failure modes in methods like Co-Teaching and DivideMix.
  • Noise structure, not just rate, is crucial for benchmark difficulty.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.