AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Behind the [MASK]: Disentangling Representation and Faithfulness in DAPF-Based Dementia Detection

arXiv:2608.25028v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Spoken-language analysis via prompt-based domain-adaptive models is a promising direction for low-resource, non-invasive dementia screening, but such models remain internally opaque. We study the interpretability of the Domain-Adapted models via Prompt-based Fine-tuning (DAPF) framework, which casts dementia detection as diagnosis-related masked-token prediction. We interpret DAPF and strong baselines using a variety of probing and analysis techniques, finding that DAPF achieved the best overall performance (accuracy=0.83 and macro-F1=0.83) with diagnosis most recoverable from its [MASK] representation. However, this representational advantage did not extend to token-level explanation faithfulness. DAPF attributions primarily reflected language task vocabulary, discourse markers, and transcription artifacts, with perturbation tests showing weak or negative effects. This suggests that its masked-token interface determines diagnosis information without producing faithful token-level explanations.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Pardis Ranjbar-Noiey, Natalie Parde

-->

[Submitted on 25 Aug 2026]

Title:Behind the [MASK]: Disentangling Representation and Faithfulness in DAPF-Based Dementia Detection

View a PDF of the paper titled Behind the [MASK]: Disentangling Representation and Faithfulness in DAPF-Based Dementia Detection, by Pardis Ranjbar-Noiey and 1 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Spoken-language analysis via prompt-based domain-adaptive models is a promising direction for low-resource, non-invasive dementia screening, but such models remain internally opaque. We study the interpretability of the Domain-Adapted models via Prompt-based Fine-tuning (DAPF) framework, which casts dementia detection as diagnosis-related masked-token prediction. We interpret DAPF and strong baselines using a variety of probing and analysis techniques, finding that DAPF achieved the best overall performance (accuracy=0.83 and macro-F1=0.83) with diagnosis most recoverable from its [MASK] representation. However, this representational advantage did not extend to token-level explanation faithfulness. DAPF attributions primarily reflected language task vocabulary, discourse markers, and transcription artifacts, with perturbation tests showing weak or negative effects. This suggests that its masked-token interface determines diagnosis information without producing faithful token-level explanations.

Comments: 16 pages, 1 figure, 19 tables. Under review at ACL Rolling Review

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2608.25028 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2608.25028v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.25028

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Pardis Ranjbar-Noiey [view email] [v1] Tue, 25 Aug 2026 18:16:05 UTC (66 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Behind the [MASK]: Disentangling Representation and Faithfulness in DAPF-Based Dementia Detection, by Pardis Ranjbar-Noiey and 1 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-08

Change to browse by:

cs cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)