Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

BD-HazardVLM: Probing Vision-Language Models for Latent Defensive-Driving Hazards in Bangladesh Road Scenes

Summary

arXiv:2610.20627v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models are increasingly used for driving-scene understanding, yet their defensive reasoning under weakly structured Global South traffic remains unclear. We introduce BD-HazardVLM, a diagnostic benchmark of 500 Bangladesh road-scene images, comprising 375 from RSUD20K and 125 from TFP-BD, annotated for hazard presence, primary hazard category, risk timing, severity, defensive actions, visible evidence, and hallucination- and Western-road-bias traps. We evaluate Qwen2.5-VL-7B, InternVL3-8B, and MiniCPM-V-4.6 using a shared zero-shot task definition and structured output schema. Binary hazard-presence accuracy ranges from 88.0 percent to 89.2 percent, essentially matching the 89.0 percent majority-class baseline. Fine-grained r…

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Abdullah Al Maruf, Md. Sajedul Islam, Tanmoy Mridha, Irfan Hossain Bhuiyan
BD-HazardVLM: Probing Vision-Language Models for Latent Defensive-Driving Hazards in Bangladesh Road Scenes
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 28 Sep 2026]

Title:BD-HazardVLM: Probing Vision-Language Models for Latent Defensive-Driving Hazards in Bangladesh Road Scenes

View a PDF of the paper titled BD-HazardVLM: Probing Vision-Language Models for Latent Defensive-Driving Hazards in Bangladesh Road Scenes, by Abdullah Al Maruf and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Vision-language models are increasingly used for driving-scene understanding, yet their defensive reasoning under weakly structured Global South traffic remains unclear. We introduce BD-HazardVLM, a diagnostic benchmark of 500 Bangladesh road-scene images, comprising 375 from RSUD20K and 125 from TFP-BD, annotated for hazard presence, primary hazard category, risk timing, severity, defensive actions, visible evidence, and hallucination- and Western-road-bias traps. We evaluate Qwen2.5-VL-7B, InternVL3-8B, and MiniCPM-V-4.6 using a shared zero-shot task definition and structured output schema. Binary hazard-presence accuracy ranges from 88.0 percent to 89.2 percent, essentially matching the 89.0 percent majority-class baseline. Fine-grained reasoning is substantially weaker: category accuracy remains below 40 percent, risk-timing accuracy ranges from 1.6 percent to 12.4 percent, and exact defensive-action matching remains below 2 percent. Although InternVL3-8B achieves the highest severity accuracy at 61.2 percent, it has zero recall on the 58 high-severity cases. Qwen exhibits severe category mode collapse, while all models show weak latent-hazard anticipation and near-zero self-reported trap recognition. For the evaluated models, these findings show that coarse hazard recognition does not imply reliable fine-grained defensive-driving reasoning and motivate geographically diverse safety evaluation.

Comments: Accepted at the ECCV 2026 Workshop on Safe and Defensive Autonomous Driving (SDAD). 16 pages, 1 figure, 5 tables

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Robotics (cs.RO)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.20627 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2610.20627v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20627

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Abdullah Al Maruf [view email] [v1] Mon, 28 Sep 2026 18:54:45 UTC (2,278 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled BD-HazardVLM: Probing Vision-Language Models for Latent Defensive-Driving Hazards in Bangladesh Road Scenes, by Abdullah Al Maruf and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.LG cs.RO

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.20627v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models are increasingly used for driving-scene understanding, yet their defensive reasoning under weakly structured…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.