AI News HubLIVE
原文2 min read

BBR-Net: Boundary-Balanced Replay for Continual Medical Image Segmentation

This paper proposes BBR-Net, a boundary-balanced replay network that selects samples using boundary-aware priority and class balance to preserve anatomical structure. Evaluated on CAMUS and CardiacNet, forward setting retains source performance and reduces catastrophic forgetting, while reverse setting reveals failure when initial representations are noisy. Structural perturbation analysis shows replay effectiveness depends on stored structural reliability.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Zahid Ullah, Sieun Choi, Jihie Kim

[2606.14731] BBR-Net: Boundary-Balanced Replay for Continual Medical Image Segmentation

[Submitted on 2 Jun 2026]

Title:BBR-Net: Boundary-Balanced Replay for Continual Medical Image Segmentation

View a PDF of the paper titled BBR-Net: Boundary-Balanced Replay for Continual Medical Image Segmentation, by Zahid Ullah and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Continual learning for medical image segmentation remains challenging under domain shift because replay-based methods often preserve appearance information without explicitly modeling anatomical structure. This study investigates whether structural consistency governs knowledge retention in continual cardiac ultrasound segmentation. We propose the Boundary-Balanced Replay Network (BBR-Net), which selects replay samples using boundary-aware priority and class balance to preserve anatomically informative regions. The method is evaluated on CAMUS and CardiacNet under forward (CAMUS to CardiacNet) and reverse (CardiacNet to CAMUS) task orders. In the forward setting, BBR-Net retains source-task performance close to an offline joint-training reference, while markedly reducing catastrophic forgetting and preserving competitive target-task adaptation. Ablation results show that boundary-aware prioritization contributes to retention and improves the balance between source-task preservation and target-task adaptation when combined with class-aware sampling. In contrast, the reverse setting reveals that structure-aware replay fails when initial representations are learned from noisy and structurally inconsistent data. To isolate this effect, we conduct a controlled structural perturbation analysis by progressively corrupting source-task boundaries while keeping the dataset, architecture, and training protocol fixed. Forgetting increases consistently as structural reliability decreases, suggesting that replay effectiveness is strongly influenced by the quality of stored structural information, rather than by memory capacity alone. These findings indicate that preserving anatomical structure under domain shift is a central factor in continual medical image segmentation, and that replay mechanisms should account for structural reliability to support robust knowledge retention.

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2606.14731 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2606.14731v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.14731

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Zahid Ullah [view email] [v1] Tue, 2 Jun 2026 04:10:01 UTC (6,827 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled BBR-Net: Boundary-Balanced Replay for Continual Medical Image Segmentation, by Zahid Ullah and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-06

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)