Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

AVAtt: A Free-Viewing Eye-Tracking Dataset and Benchmark for Visual Attention on Paintings

Summary

A new arXiv paper introduces AVAtt, a free-viewing eye-tracking dataset of paintings spanning 16 art movements across five centuries, with individual scanpaths and fixation data from multiple participants. It benchmarks classic and deep saliency models and ranks 44 scanpath-similarity measures, revealing substantial headroom for art-aware models.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Mohamed Amine Kerkouri, Marouane Tliba, Aladine Chetouani, Alessandro Bruno
AVAtt: A Free-Viewing Eye-Tracking Dataset and Benchmark for Visual Attention on Paintings
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 21 Oct 2026]

Title:AVAtt: A Free-Viewing Eye-Tracking Dataset and Benchmark for Visual Attention on Paintings

View a PDF of the paper titled AVAtt: A Free-Viewing Eye-Tracking Dataset and Benchmark for Visual Attention on Paintings, by Mohamed Amine Kerkouri and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Saliency and scanpath models are developed almost exclusively on natural photographs, yet paintings are composed by artists to guide the viewer's eye and differ from photographs in texture, colour and abstraction. We introduce \avatt, a free-viewing eye-tracking dataset on \nImages{} paintings spanning sixteen art movements and five centuries, with \nScanpaths{} scanpaths and \nFixations{} fixations from \nParticipants{} participants (\spPerImageMin--\spPerImageMax{} observers per painting). For every painting we release individual scanpaths with fixation timing and eye--screen distance, fixation maps, saliency maps smoothed at one degree of visual angle, temporal saliency videos and rich art metadata. We benchmark classic and deep saliency models against human agreement, revealing substantial headroom for art-aware models, and rank 44 scanpath-similarity measures, including a new language-free family of image-encoder metrics built on ten CNN, ViT and self-supervised encoders. With controls that remove viewing biases, we show that faces are fixated \faceEnrich$\times$ more than expected and within half a second, that local structure draws the eye, that composition rules fitted from image content predict where people look, and that art style shapes how much viewers agree. Dataset, code and a Python package are available at: this https URL.

Comments: Extenstion of https://doi.org/10.1145/3649902.3655656 published at ETRA 2024

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Image and Video Processing (eess.IV)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.30481 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2610.30481v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.30481

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Mohamed Amine Kerkouri [view email] [v1] Wed, 21 Oct 2026 22:02:01 UTC (25,997 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled AVAtt: A Free-Viewing Eye-Tracking Dataset and Benchmark for Visual Attention on Paintings, by Mohamed Amine Kerkouri and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.HC eess eess.IV

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

ResearchersAdvanced

Key points

  • The dataset covers 16 art movements over five centuries and releases per-painting scanpaths with fixation timing and eye-screen distance, fixation maps, saliency maps smoothed at one degree of visual angle, temporal saliency videos, and art metadata.
  • Benchmarking classic and deep saliency models against human agreement shows substantial headroom for art-aware models.
  • The work ranks 44 scanpath-similarity measures, including a new language-free family of image-encoder metrics built on ten CNN, ViT and self-supervised encoders.
  • With viewing-bias controls removed, faces are fixated more than expected within half a second, local structure draws the eye, composition rules fitted from image content predict gaze, and art style shapes viewer agreement.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.