Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Autonomous UAV Route Planning for Coverage Maximization in Environmental Monitoring: A Systematic Literature Review

Summary

This paper reports a systematic literature review on autonomous UAV route planning for coverage-oriented environmental monitoring. Following the PRISMA 2020 framework, it searches Scopus and Web of Science for studies from 2015 to 2026, focusing on path planning, coverage path planning, and informative path planning. Preliminary analysis of 247 retained studies reveals a concentration on coverage formulations, multi-UAV coordination, and energy-aware optimization, with fewer addressing weather, uncertainty, or obstacles. Most studies rely on simulation validation, indicating a simulation-to-reality gap, and recent work shows growing interest in reinforcement learning, hybrid optimization, and geometry-aware planning.

SourcearXiv RoboticsAuthor: Sebastian Jouannet-Contreras, Carola Figueroa-Flores
Autonomous UAV Route Planning for Coverage Maximization in Environmental Monitoring: A Systematic Literature Review
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 3 Jul 2026]

Title:Autonomous UAV Route Planning for Coverage Maximization in Environmental Monitoring: A Systematic Literature Review

View a PDF of the paper titled Autonomous UAV Route Planning for Coverage Maximization in Environmental Monitoring: A Systematic Literature Review, by Sebastian Jouannet-Contreras and Carola Figueroa-Flores

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Environmental monitoring with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) requires route planning methods that maximize covered area while handling energy limits, operational constraints, and geometric complexity. This paper reports the protocol and preliminary results of an ongoing systematic literature review (SLR) on autonomous UAV route planning for coverage-oriented environmental monitoring. The review follows the PRISMA 2020 framework and searches Scopus and Web of Science for studies published between 2015 and 2026. The protocol focuses on path planning, coverage path planning, and informative path planning, with emphasis on algorithmic families, coverage and energy metrics, obstacle handling, geometric environment representations, and environmental constraints. At the current stage, 562 records have been identified, 161 duplicates have been removed, and 401 unique records have been screened by title, abstract, and keywords. From these, 247 studies were retained for full-text eligibility assessment (235 eligible and 12 borderline records to be resolved during full-text review). A preliminary analysis of the retained studies suggests strong concentration on coverage-oriented formulations, multi-UAV coordination, and energy-aware optimization, while fewer studies explicitly address weather, uncertainty, or obstacle-rich environments. Most retained studies rely on simulation-based validation, highlighting a potential simulation-to-reality gap, and recent publications show increasing interest in reinforcement learning, hybrid optimization, and geometry-aware planning. These early findings indicate an active but fragmented research landscape and support the need for a structured synthesis to identify mature techniques and unresolved gaps for realistic environmental monitoring missions.

Comments: Accepted in CLEI 2026

Subjects:

Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.13054 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2607.13054v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.13054

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Journal reference: CLEI 2026

Submission history

From: Carola Figueroa Flores [view email] [v1] Fri, 3 Jul 2026 22:19:36 UTC (12 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Autonomous UAV Route Planning for Coverage Maximization in Environmental Monitoring: A Systematic Literature Review, by Sebastian Jouannet-Contreras and Carola Figueroa-Flores

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.RO

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

ResearchersAdvanced

Key points

  • Systematic review of 562 records (2015-2026), 247 retained for full-text assessment.
  • Focus on coverage-oriented path planning, multi-UAV coordination, and energy-aware optimization; limited attention to weather, uncertainty, and obstacles.
  • Majority of studies use simulation-based validation, highlighting simulation-to-reality gap; recent trends toward reinforcement learning, hybrid optimization, and geometry-aware planning.
  • Review aims to identify mature techniques and unresolved gaps for realistic environmental monitoring missions.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.