Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Automatic Construction of Strong Simple Baselines

Summary

A new study uses large language models to automatically build simple baselines for scientific deep learning tasks, recovering a median of 95.5% of the performance gap across 36 tasks from top journals and matching or exceeding the original model in 12 studies, offering a scalable check on deep learning contributions.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Caleb N. Ellington, Jiaqi Wang, Sohan Addagudi, Elijah Cole
Automatic Construction of Strong Simple Baselines
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 28 Oct 2026]

Title:Automatic Construction of Strong Simple Baselines

View a PDF of the paper titled Automatic Construction of Strong Simple Baselines, by Caleb N. Ellington and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:To rigorously establish the value of a novel deep learning method, it must be compared against appropriate baselines. As deep learning has become increasingly common in the physical and life sciences, there have been numerous cases in which apparent progress has turned out to be an artifact of omitted or missing baselines. In this work, we investigate whether this problem can be mitigated by using large language models to automate the construction of baselines. We assemble 36 supervised classification and regression tasks from peer-reviewed studies in Nature, Science, and Cell-family journals that investigate novel deep learning methods for scientific applications. We then use a language model to construct simple baselines for each task. These automatically constructed baselines are strong, recovering a median of 95.5% (mean 85.7%) of the gap between a trivial predictor and the score of the deep learning model. The median simple baseline matches or exceeds the performance of the deep learning model in 12 studies. We further examine the variation across scientific domains and publication venues and we characterize the effects of test-time compute and access to different levels of study context. As human peer review has struggled to keep up with the rapidly increasing volume of research articles in recent years, our results suggest that automated baseline construction is a practical and scalable check on deep learning contributions in the physical and life sciences.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.40700 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.40700v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.40700

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Caleb Ellington [view email] [v1] Wed, 28 Oct 2026 19:46:19 UTC (347 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Automatic Construction of Strong Simple Baselines, by Caleb N. Ellington and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs q-bio q-bio.QM

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Researchers assembled 36 supervised classification and regression tasks from Nature, Science, and Cell-family journals and used a language model to construct simple baselines.
  • Automatically constructed baselines recovered a median of 95.5% (mean 85.7%) of the gap between a trivial predictor and the deep learning model, and matched or exceeded model performance in 12 studies.
  • The results suggest automated baseline construction is a practical, scalable check on deep learning contributions in physical and life sciences amid growing peer-review pressure.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.