Auditing Training-Free 3D Shape Retrieval with Diffused Geodesic Moments
This paper audits evaluation protocols for training-free shape descriptors by introducing Diffused Geodesic Moments (DGM). Experiments show that Geometric Moment Shape Descriptor based on Heat Kernel Signature (GMSD-HKS) achieves the highest scores on FAUST-Reg and TOSCA, while Wave Kernel Signature (WKS) remains strong. DGM is valuable for sparse or non-spectral applications. The work provides a reproducible protocol-cascade analysis, cross-shape alignment diagnostic, and recommendations for designing and reporting training-free descriptors.
Article intelligence
Key points
- Introduces Diffused Geodesic Moments (DGM) as a training-free descriptor for protocol audit
- GMSD-HKS outperforms other methods on FAUST-Reg and TOSCA; WKS remains competitive
- Offers protocol-cascade analysis, cross-shape alignment diagnostic, and best practices
- Highlights the dominant role of input field and aggregation protocol over moment formula
Why it matters
This matters because introduces Diffused Geodesic Moments (DGM) as a training-free descriptor for protocol audit.
Technical impact
May affect research directions, evaluation methods, open-source reproduction, and productization paths.
[2605.29004] Auditing Training-Free 3D Shape Retrieval with Diffused Geodesic Moments
[Submitted on 27 May 2026]
Title:Auditing Training-Free 3D Shape Retrieval with Diffused Geodesic Moments
View a PDF of the paper titled Auditing Training-Free 3D Shape Retrieval with Diffused Geodesic Moments, by Zhicheng Du and 7 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Reported retrieval scores for training-free shape descriptors conflate local signal design, normalization, aggregation, codebook fitting, and metric choices, making isolated component evaluation difficult. This paper reframes descriptor evaluation as a {\em protocol audit}. We introduce Diffused Geodesic Moments (DGM), a seed-conditioned descriptor that computes sparse implicit heat responses, converts them to distance-like fields, and summarizes each vertex by low-order moments across seeds and scales. DGM is used both as a practical non-spectral baseline and as an instrument for isolating protocol effects. On the registered FAUST benchmark split (FAUST-Reg) and the TOSCA shape collection, aggregation-matched experiments show that an independent Geometric Moment Shape Descriptor baseline built on Heat Kernel Signature features (GMSD-HKS) obtains the highest scores in this implementation ($0.621/0.820$ and $0.865/0.963$ mean average precision (mAP)/top-1), Wave Kernel Signature (WKS) remains a strong classical signal, and DGM is useful mainly when sparse solves, non-spectral deployment, or symmetry-informative seed frames are priorities. The broader finding is methodological: the input field and aggregation protocol can dominate the moment formula. The paper contributes a reproducible protocol-cascade analysis, a cross-shape alignment diagnostic for functional-map compatibility, and concrete recommendations for designing and reporting training-free shape descriptors.
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Graphics (cs.GR)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.29004 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2605.29004v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.29004
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Zhicheng Du [view email] [v1] Wed, 27 May 2026 19:00:41 UTC (2,676 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Auditing Training-Free 3D Shape Retrieval with Diffused Geodesic Moments, by Zhicheng Du and 7 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CV
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs cs.GR
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)