AI News HubLIVE
原文

Auditing Training-Free 3D Shape Retrieval with Diffused Geodesic Moments

This paper audits evaluation protocols for training-free shape descriptors by introducing Diffused Geodesic Moments (DGM). Experiments show that Geometric Moment Shape Descriptor based on Heat Kernel Signature (GMSD-HKS) achieves the highest scores on FAUST-Reg and TOSCA, while Wave Kernel Signature (WKS) remains strong. DGM is valuable for sparse or non-spectral applications. The work provides a reproducible protocol-cascade analysis, cross-shape alignment diagnostic, and recommendations for designing and reporting training-free descriptors.

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • Introduces Diffused Geodesic Moments (DGM) as a training-free descriptor for protocol audit
  • GMSD-HKS outperforms other methods on FAUST-Reg and TOSCA; WKS remains competitive
  • Offers protocol-cascade analysis, cross-shape alignment diagnostic, and best practices
  • Highlights the dominant role of input field and aggregation protocol over moment formula

Why it matters

This matters because introduces Diffused Geodesic Moments (DGM) as a training-free descriptor for protocol audit.

Technical impact

May affect research directions, evaluation methods, open-source reproduction, and productization paths.

[2605.29004] Auditing Training-Free 3D Shape Retrieval with Diffused Geodesic Moments

[Submitted on 27 May 2026]

Title:Auditing Training-Free 3D Shape Retrieval with Diffused Geodesic Moments

View a PDF of the paper titled Auditing Training-Free 3D Shape Retrieval with Diffused Geodesic Moments, by Zhicheng Du and 7 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Reported retrieval scores for training-free shape descriptors conflate local signal design, normalization, aggregation, codebook fitting, and metric choices, making isolated component evaluation difficult. This paper reframes descriptor evaluation as a {\em protocol audit}. We introduce Diffused Geodesic Moments (DGM), a seed-conditioned descriptor that computes sparse implicit heat responses, converts them to distance-like fields, and summarizes each vertex by low-order moments across seeds and scales. DGM is used both as a practical non-spectral baseline and as an instrument for isolating protocol effects. On the registered FAUST benchmark split (FAUST-Reg) and the TOSCA shape collection, aggregation-matched experiments show that an independent Geometric Moment Shape Descriptor baseline built on Heat Kernel Signature features (GMSD-HKS) obtains the highest scores in this implementation ($0.621/0.820$ and $0.865/0.963$ mean average precision (mAP)/top-1), Wave Kernel Signature (WKS) remains a strong classical signal, and DGM is useful mainly when sparse solves, non-spectral deployment, or symmetry-informative seed frames are priorities. The broader finding is methodological: the input field and aggregation protocol can dominate the moment formula. The paper contributes a reproducible protocol-cascade analysis, a cross-shape alignment diagnostic for functional-map compatibility, and concrete recommendations for designing and reporting training-free shape descriptors.

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Graphics (cs.GR)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.29004 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2605.29004v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.29004

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Zhicheng Du [view email] [v1] Wed, 27 May 2026 19:00:41 UTC (2,676 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Auditing Training-Free 3D Shape Retrieval with Diffused Geodesic Moments, by Zhicheng Du and 7 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.GR

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)