AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

ASK in the Dark: Uncertainty-Gated LLM Assistance under Partial Observability

Reinforcement learning agents under partial observability can benefit from SLM guidance, but vanilla uncertainty-gating fails. The proposed ASK+ provides trajectory-aware context and chain-of-thought reasoning, turning the SLM into an informative consultant. Experiments show significant gains on DoorKey, FourRooms, and HigherLower, with prompt design dominating model scale.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Juarez Monteiro, Nathan Gavenski, Guilherme Lima, Francisco Galuppo, Odinaldo Rodrigues, Adriano Veloso

-->

[Submitted on 2 Jul 2026]

Title:ASK in the Dark: Uncertainty-Gated LLM Assistance under Partial Observability

View a PDF of the paper titled ASK in the Dark: Uncertainty-Gated LLM Assistance under Partial Observability, by Juarez Monteiro and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Reinforcement learning agents operating under partial observability must act on incomplete information, making them natural candidates for guidance from small language models (SLMs) that carry broad reasoning priors. Yet integrating SLM guidance into this setting has proven difficult: across all test environments, vanilla uncertainty-gated approaches achieve an overwrite rate at or near zero, meaning the SLM almost never contributes an independent action. We trace this failure to the bare egocentric prompt, which provides insufficient context for genuine reasoning, and identify it as a context problem rather than a capacity problem. We propose ASK+, which supplies the SLM with trajectory-aware context (a partially revealed map, visited positions, and action history) and structured chain-of-thought reasoning, converting it from a passive redundancy check into a more informative consultant that occasionally corrects the policy. We further establish that the predictive entropy signal used for selective querying measures action uncertainty rather than state uncertainty and remains informative in POMDPs, making uncertainty-gated assistance viable beyond fully observable settings. The stateful prompt drives substantial gains: on DoorKey, where vanilla ASK matches PPO (both 89%), ASK+ reaches 93% success; on FourRooms, success climbs from 53% to 70%; on HigherLower, accuracy reaches 73.7%, matching the SLM-only upper bound. Across all environments, Qwen3.5-2B matches or exceeds Qwen3.5-4B, confirming that prompt design and selective gating dominate the impact of model scale, enabling guidance without large models.

Comments: Accepted at the IJCAI-ECAI Joint Workshop on Planning for Complex Real-World Applications and Bridging the Gap Between AI Planning and (Reinforcement) Learning

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.02686 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2607.02686v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.02686

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Nathan Gavenski [view email] [v1] Thu, 2 Jul 2026 18:26:05 UTC (64 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled ASK in the Dark: Uncertainty-Gated LLM Assistance under Partial Observability, by Juarez Monteiro and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)