Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
More
Summary only

ArXiv will ban researchers who upload papers full of AI slop

ArXiv, a popular platform for preprint academic research, is taking a new step to attempt to reduce the volume of papers that include AI slop. If a paper has "incontrovertible evidence that the authors did not check the results of LLM generation," such as hallucinated references or "meta-comments" left by an LLM, authors will be banned from ArXiv for a year, according to Thomas Dietterich, ArXiv's section chair of its computer science section. Future ArXiv submissions will also have to be accepted at "a reputable peer-reviewed venue."

SourceThe Verge AIAuthor: Jay Peters
ArXiv will ban researchers who upload papers full of AI slop
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions

Summary only

Under the source content permission, this page provides an editorial summary, key points, and a link to the original article.

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • ArXiv will impose a one-year ban on authors whose papers show clear signs of unchecked LLM output, such as hallucinated references or meta-comments.
  • After the ban, future submissions must first be accepted by a reputable peer-reviewed venue.
  • The policy applies only to cases with "incontrovertible evidence," and authors can appeal.
  • Previously, ArXiv limited computer science review articles to those already peer-reviewed.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.