Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

ArtSociety: Multi-Agent Multimodal Collaboration for Art Emotion Understanding

Summary

arXiv:2609.13240v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The AffectiveArt Multidimensional Art Emotion Understanding task asks to jointly predict an artwork's fine-grained emotion (12 classes, 1549:1 head-to-tail ratio), binary valence/arousal, and five attribute-grounded descriptions -- sub-tasks that exhibit strong empirical trade-offs, so the single-model solutions we tried do not jointly optimize all of them well. We present ArtSociety, a multi-agent framework that assembles heterogeneous multimodal experts -- a DINOv2-Giant vision agent (A1), a scene-grounded CoT fine-tuned MLLM (A2), and three closed-source reasoning agents (A3-A5) -- and coordinates them with two training-free controllers: (i) a rare-class-aware voting arbiter that lowers the agreement threshold for tail emotions, exploitin…

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Jian Li, Fanfan Ji, Jinxiang Lai, Ying Tai, Jian Yang, Xiao-Tong Yuan, Chengjie Wang, Yabiao Wang
ArtSociety: Multi-Agent Multimodal Collaboration for Art Emotion Understanding
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 3 Sep 2026]

Title:ArtSociety: Multi-Agent Multimodal Collaboration for Art Emotion Understanding

View a PDF of the paper titled ArtSociety: Multi-Agent Multimodal Collaboration for Art Emotion Understanding, by Jian Li and 7 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:The AffectiveArt Multidimensional Art Emotion Understanding task asks to jointly predict an artwork's fine-grained emotion (12 classes, 1549:1 head-to-tail ratio), binary valence/arousal, and five attribute-grounded descriptions -- sub-tasks that exhibit strong empirical trade-offs, so the single-model solutions we tried do not jointly optimize all of them well. We present ArtSociety, a multi-agent framework that assembles heterogeneous multimodal experts -- a DINOv2-Giant vision agent (A1), a scene-grounded CoT fine-tuned MLLM (A2), and three closed-source reasoning agents (A3-A5) -- and coordinates them with two training-free controllers: (i) a rare-class-aware voting arbiter that lowers the agreement threshold for tail emotions, exploiting decorrelated error patterns across agent families; and (ii) a description-first reasoning agent whose DESCRIBE-then-CLASSIFY chain of thought forces visual evidence before label commitment, yielding near-perfect grounded descriptions. A task-routing policy directs the hard emotion task to the full five-agent ensemble while assigning the near-saturated valence/arousal and generative description tasks to the single strongest reasoning agent. On the official test set (1,000 artworks), ArtSociety achieves an Overall Score of 0.8870 (Classification 0.7789, Description 0.9952). An eleven-variant ablation study reveals that, once method and scale saturate at around 0.76, the decisive gains come from agent collaboration and data-side supervision -- a 30B MoE model trained on older data does not outperform an 8B model trained on better data. Code is available at this https URL

Comments: Accepted at the ACM Multimedia 2026 Grand Challenge (AffectiveArt). 8 pages, 5 figures, 3 tables. Code: this https URL

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

ACM classes: I.2.10; I.2.7; I.4.8; H.5.1

Cite as: arXiv:2609.13240 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2609.13240v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.13240

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Related DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1145/3767308.3837723

DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Jian Li [view email] [v1] Thu, 3 Sep 2026 11:25:15 UTC (7,332 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled ArtSociety: Multi-Agent Multimodal Collaboration for Art Emotion Understanding, by Jian Li and 7 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.13240v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The AffectiveArt Multidimensional Art Emotion Understanding task asks to jointly predict an artwork's fine-grained emotion (12 clas…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.