Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Artificial Intelligence in Mechanical Engineering: Foundations, Opportunities, Challenges, and Responsibilities

Summary

This arXiv paper, based on a round-table at COBEM 2025, presents a structured perspective on AI in mechanical engineering, emphasizing that AI should complement rather than replace engineering judgment and proposing principles for responsible adoption including physical consistency, rigorous validation, uncertainty quantification, energy sustainability, human oversight, and ethical responsibility.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: A. Cunha Jr, C. Nataraj, L. M. Lorenzo, H. Panetto, A. Scotti, J. V. C. Vargas
Artificial Intelligence in Mechanical Engineering: Foundations, Opportunities, Challenges, and Responsibilities
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 22 Oct 2026]

Title:Artificial Intelligence in Mechanical Engineering: Foundations, Opportunities, Challenges, and Responsibilities

View a PDF of the paper titled Artificial Intelligence in Mechanical Engineering: Foundations, Opportunities, Challenges, and Responsibilities, by A. Cunha Jr and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping mechanical engineering (ME), from modeling, simulation, and optimization to diagnostics, design, and technical communication. Drawing on a round-table at the 28th ABCM International Congress on Mechanical Engineering (COBEM 2025), this article presents a structured perspective for the Brazilian and international ME communities. Rather than an exhaustive survey, it examines how AI can enhance engineering practice without compromising scientific rigor. We distinguish statistical learning from human cognition and discuss the capabilities, limitations, and emerging agentic forms of AI. We then consider industrial adoption, workforce changes, and AI-assisted scientific discovery, alongside the energy and infrastructure demands of AI computation and their implications for sustainability and thermal management. The discussion emphasizes the integration of physical knowledge, structured reasoning, and domain expertise into AI systems, particularly in safety-relevant applications. Topics include physics-informed and hybrid learning, physically constrained modeling, validation, uncertainty quantification, and certification. We also examine educational, epistemological, and ethical challenges, including curriculum reform, human-agent collaboration, professional accountability, and the preservation of engineering knowledge. We conclude with principles for responsible AI adoption in ME: physical consistency, rigorous validation, explicit treatment of uncertainty, energy sustainability, human oversight, and ethical responsibility. AI should complement, not replace, engineering judgment.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Applications (stat.AP)

MSC classes: 68T01, 68T05, 68T37, 68T42 68T42, 68T05, 68T37, 68T42

ACM classes: I.2.0; I.2.1; J.2; K.7.4; K.3.2

Cite as: arXiv:2610.33105 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.33105v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.33105

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Journal reference: J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 48, 741 (2026)

Related DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-026-06873-x

DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Americo Cunha Jr [view email] [v1] Thu, 22 Oct 2026 17:02:41 UTC (7,048 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Artificial Intelligence in Mechanical Engineering: Foundations, Opportunities, Challenges, and Responsibilities, by A. Cunha Jr and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CE cs.LG stat stat.AP

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI is reshaping mechanical engineering across modeling, simulation, optimization, diagnostics, design, and technical communication, but statistical learning must be distinguished from human cognition.
  • Safety-relevant applications require integrating physical knowledge, structured reasoning, and domain expertise into AI systems, with topics including physics-informed and hybrid learning, physically constrained modeling, validation, uncertainty quantification, and certification.
  • Educational, epistemological, and ethical challenges include curriculum reform, human-agent collaboration, professional accountability, and preservation of engineering knowledge.
  • Responsible AI adoption in ME rests on principles: physical consistency, rigorous validation, explicit treatment of uncertainty, energy sustainability, human oversight, and ethical responsibility.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.