AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Artifact-Bench: Evaluating MLLMs on Detecting and Assessing the Artifacts of AI-Generated Videos

Artifact-Bench is a new benchmark for systematically evaluating multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on detecting and analyzing artifacts in AI-generated videos. It establishes a three-level hierarchical taxonomy covering photorealistic, animated, and CG-style videos, and defines three complementary tasks. Experiments on 19 leading MLLMs reveal substantial limitations in artifact perception and reasoning, with many models performing near or below random in challenging settings, and significant misalignment with human perceptual preferences.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Yuqi Tang, Yang Shi, Zhuoran Zhang, Qixun Wang, Xuehai Bai, Yue Ding, Ruizhe Chen, Bohan Zeng, Xinlong Chen, Xuanyu Zhu, Bozhou Li, Yuran Wang, Yifan Dai, Chengzhuo Tong, Xinyu Liu, Yiyan Ji, Yujie Wei, Yuhao Dong, Shilin Yan, Fengxiang Wang, Yi-Fan Zhang, Haotian Wang, Yuanxing Zhang, Pengfei Wan

[2605.18984] Artifact-Bench: Evaluating MLLMs on Detecting and Assessing the Artifacts of AI-Generated Videos

[Submitted on 18 May 2026]

Title:Artifact-Bench: Evaluating MLLMs on Detecting and Assessing the Artifacts of AI-Generated Videos

View a PDF of the paper titled Artifact-Bench: Evaluating MLLMs on Detecting and Assessing the Artifacts of AI-Generated Videos, by Yuqi Tang and 23 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Recent video generative models have greatly improved the realism of AI-generated videos, yet their outputs still exhibit artifacts such as temporal inconsistencies, structural distortions, and semantic incoherence. While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) show strong visual understanding capabilities, their ability to perceive and reason about such artifacts remains unclear. Existing benchmarks often lack systematic evaluation of artifact-aware perception and fine-grained diagnostic reasoning, especially across diverse AI-generated video domains beyond photorealistic content. To address this gap, we introduce Artifact-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating MLLMs on AI-generated video artifact detection and analysis. We first establish a three-level hierarchical taxonomy of realism artifacts, covering photorealistic, animated, and CG-style videos. Based on this taxonomy, Artifact-Bench defines three complementary tasks: real vs. AI-generated video classification, pairwise realism comparison, and fine-grained artifact identification. Experiments on 19 leading MLLMs reveal substantial limitations in artifact perception and reasoning, with many models approaching random or even below-random performance in challenging settings. We further observe significant misalignment between MLLM judgments and human perceptual preferences, highlighting their limited reliability as general evaluators for AI-generated video realism.

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.18984 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2605.18984v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.18984

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Yang Shi [view email] [v1] Mon, 18 May 2026 18:04:54 UTC (21,044 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Artifact-Bench: Evaluating MLLMs on Detecting and Assessing the Artifacts of AI-Generated Videos, by Yuqi Tang and 23 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)