Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Architecture-Adaptive Uncertainty Fusion for Deepfake Detection

Summary

A new framework called Correlation-Optimized Fusion (COF) combines five uncertainty sources for deepfake detection, requiring only 42 seconds of optimization. It outperforms other methods under distribution shift but faces catastrophic failure across datasets, highlighting the need for domain-adaptive uncertainty quantification.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Ritesh Sharma, Mohammad Ghasemigol, Yuichi Motai
Architecture-Adaptive Uncertainty Fusion for Deepfake Detection
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2606.06666] Architecture-Adaptive Uncertainty Fusion for Deepfake Detection

[Submitted on 4 Jun 2026]

Title:Architecture-Adaptive Uncertainty Fusion for Deepfake Detection

View a PDF of the paper titled Architecture-Adaptive Uncertainty Fusion for Deepfake Detection, by Ritesh Sharma and 1 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Deepfake detection systems achieve near-perfect accuracy on benchmarks, yet forensic deployment demands reliable prediction uncertainty. Existing uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods rely on single sources and ignore that optimal uncertainty composition varies across architectures. We propose Correlation-Optimized Fusion (COF), an architecture-adaptive framework that fuses five complementary uncertainty sources -- epistemic, aleatoric, calibration, conformal, and distributional -- by maximizing Pearson correlation between fused uncertainty scores and prediction errors via constrained optimization on the probability simplex. COF requires no model modifications and only 42 s of weight optimization, compared to 20--45 h for a 5-model Deep Ensemble. Evaluation across eleven architectures on FaceForensics++ reveals a fundamental trade-off: under matched train/evaluation protocol, non-linear methods achieve approximately 5--6% higher in-domain correlation than COF (mean r = 0.438), but this reverses under distribution shift. On CelebDF, COF outperforms Random Forest in 9/11 architectures with up to 7.3x higher correlation (MaxViT-B: r = 0.249 vs. 0.034); RF degrades 85% cross-domain to r = 0.071, whereas COF retains substantially more signal (74% drop to r = 0.116). Cross-dataset evaluation on CelebDF and DFDC reveals catastrophic generalization failure across all methods: in-domain correlations of 0.41--0.47 collapse to near-zero externally (mean degradation 90.7%), with seven of eleven architectures exhibiting uncertainty inversion. These results establish COF as a practical, interpretable framework for controlled-distribution deployment and identify domain-adaptive UQ as the central open challenge for forensic deployment.

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2606.06666 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2606.06666v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.06666

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Ritesh Sharma [view email] [v1] Thu, 4 Jun 2026 19:28:55 UTC (1,071 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Architecture-Adaptive Uncertainty Fusion for Deepfake Detection, by Ritesh Sharma and 1 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-06

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • COF fuses five uncertainty sources and optimizes in 42 seconds.
  • Outperforms random forest in 9/11 architectures under shift.
  • Cross-dataset evaluation shows severe generalization failure.
  • Domain-adaptive UQ is identified as a key open challenge.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.