Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Anti-Causal Domain Generalization: Leveraging Unlabeled Data

Summary

This paper studies domain generalization in an anti-causal setting where the outcome causes the covariates. The authors propose two methods that leverage unlabeled data from multiple environments to regularize the model's sensitivity to changes in the mean and covariance of covariates, with worst-case optimality guarantees. Empirical results are shown on a controlled physical system and a physiological signal dataset.

Anti-Causal Domain Generalization: Leveraging Unlabeled Data
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

content type paperpublished July 2026

Anti-Causal Domain Generalization: Leveraging Unlabeled Data

AuthorsSorawit Saengkyongam†, Juan L. Gamella, Andrew C. Miller†, Jonas Peters‡, Nicolai Meinshausen‡, Christina Heinze-Deml†

View publication

The problem of domain generalization concerns learning predictive models that are robust to distribution shifts when deployed in new, previously unseen environments. Existing methods typically require labeled data from multiple training environments, limiting their applicability when labeled data are scarce. In this work, we study domain generalization in an anti-causal setting, where the outcome causes the observed covariates. Under this structure, environment perturbations that affect the covariates do not propagate to the outcome, which motivates regularizing the model’s sensitivity to these perturbations. Crucially, estimating these perturbation directions does not require labels, enabling us to leverage unlabeled data from multiple environments. We propose two methods that penalize the model’s sensitivity to variations in the mean and covariance of the covariates across environments, respectively, and prove that these methods have worst-case optimality guarantees under certain classes of environments. Finally, we demonstrate the empirical performance of our approach on a controlled physical system and a physiological signal dataset.

† Apple

‡ ETH Zürich

Considerations for Distribution Shift Robustness in Health

May 2, 2023research area Health, research area Methods and Algorithmsconference ICLR

*=Equal Contributors

This paper was accepted at the workshop “Trustworthy Machine Learning for Healthcare Workshop” at the conference ICLR 2023.

When analyzing robustness of predictive models under distribution shift, many works focus on tackling generalization in the presence of spurious correlations. In this case, one typically makes use of covariates or environment indicators to enforce independencies in learned models to guarantee…

Read more

More Speaking or More Speakers?

March 14, 2023research area Speech and Natural Language Processingconference ICASSP

Self-training (ST) and self-supervised learning (SSL) methods have demonstrated strong improvements in automatic speech recognition (ASR). In spite of these advances, to the best of our knowledge, there is no analysis of how the composition of the labelled and unlabelled datasets used in these methods affects the results. In this work we aim to analyse the effect of number of speakers in the training data on a recent SSL algorithm (wav2vec 2.0),…

Read more

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Proposes domain generalization methods for anti-causal settings using unlabeled data to estimate perturbation directions.
  • Two methods penalize sensitivity to mean and covariance variations across environments.
  • Provides theoretical guarantees and empirical validation on physical and physiological datasets.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.