Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source3 min read

Anatomy of a failure: When, how, and why deep vision fails in scientific domains

Summary

The naive application of deep learning to scientific imaging (e.g., infrared) leads to critical failures due to a mismatch between data priors and DL's simplicity bias, causing models to collapse to one-dimensional predictions and underperform even compared to RGB-based models.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Ji-Hun Oh, Dou Hoon Kwark, Kianoush Falahkheirkhah, Kevin Yeh, John Cheville, Volodymyr Kindratenko, Rohit Bhargava
Anatomy of a failure: When, how, and why deep vision fails in scientific domains
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.04231] Anatomy of a failure: When, how, and why deep vision fails in scientific domains

Skip to main content

Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.

We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate

> cs > arXiv:2605.04231

Help | Advanced Search

All fields Title Author Abstract Comments Journal reference ACM classification MSC classification Report number arXiv identifier DOI ORCID arXiv author ID Help pages Full text

Search

GO

quick links

Login

Help Pages

About

-->

Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

arXiv:2605.04231 (cs)

[Submitted on 5 May 2026]

Title:Anatomy of a failure: When, how, and why deep vision fails in scientific domains

Authors:Ji-Hun Oh, Dou Hoon Kwark, Kianoush Falahkheirkhah, Kevin Yeh, John Cheville, Volodymyr Kindratenko, Rohit Bhargava

View a PDF of the paper titled Anatomy of a failure: When, how, and why deep vision fails in scientific domains, by Ji-Hun Oh and 6 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Mirroring its ubiquity in popular media and all human activities, the use of deep learning (DL) is rapidly growing in scientific imaging modalities. However, unlike everyday RGB pictures, pixels encode precise physicochemical properties in scientific imaging across potentially thousands of channels. While DL is well validated on human-centric RGB perceptual tasks, its effectiveness for scientific imaging remains uncertain. Here, we show that the naive application of DL frameworks to scientific images can lead to critical failures. We evaluate the use of DL for pathology, comparing RGB images of stained tissue with the quantitative and information-rich biochemical signatures of infrared (IR) imaging. Despite this informational advantage, DL models trained on IR data paradoxically underperform. We investigate this discrepancy to find that IR data priors interact poorly with the simplicity bias of DL, causing models to collapse to one-dimensional predictions. This constitutes a catastrophic DL failure because the model's representational capacity remains largely unused, while furthermore raising AI safety concerns and undermining the advantages of such scientific modalities. Notably, this problem persists even with state-of-the-art DL robustification strategies, which are primarily designed and validated for RGB imagery and thus inherit the same prior-bias mismatch. This work establishes a framework for understanding the limitations of generic DL in science and advocates for the study of modality-specific failure modes to guide the development of specialized, safe AI algorithms.

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.04231 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2605.04231v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.04231

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Ji-Hun Oh [view email] [v1] Tue, 5 May 2026 19:17:00 UTC (3,747 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Anatomy of a failure: When, how, and why deep vision fails in scientific domains, by Ji-Hun Oh and 6 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

About

Help

contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact

subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe

Copyright

Privacy Policy

Web Accessibility Assistance

arXiv Operational Status

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Deep learning applied directly to scientific images can fail catastrophically, with models using only one dimension of their capacity.
  • Despite richer data, DL models on infrared imaging paradoxically underperform RGB models due to prior-bias mismatch.
  • Existing robustification strategies designed for RGB imagery fail to address these modality-specific issues, highlighting the need for specialized AI algorithms.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.