Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

AlphaDiana: A Measurement System for Agents in Verifiable Reasoning Tasks

Summary

arXiv:2610.20675v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agents pair reasoning models with harnesses that organize model calls, execute tools, load skill instructions, and retain history in memory. Understanding agent performance requires linking execution conditions to outcomes, behavior, and resource use. We introduce AlphaDiana, a measurement system with modular interfaces for datasets, agents, environments, and scorers. It preserves harness-native control loops while controlling file reuse and memory retention separately. AlphaDiana supports macro analyses of complete agents and micro interventions on agent components such as tools, skills, and memory under matched conditions. We study three open-source models and three open-source harnesses on five answer-based benchmarks, with two models als…

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Zhanke Zhou, Zongze Li, Weikai Huang, Xuan Li, Chentao Cao, Xiao Feng, Xiangyu Lu, Jinbo Hu, Yi Xie, Nico Pelleriti, Shiyang Liu, Menghan Lu, Max Zimmer, Brando Miranda, Jiangchao Yao, Bo Liu, Sanmi Koyejo, Sebastian Pokutta, Bo Han
AlphaDiana: A Measurement System for Agents in Verifiable Reasoning Tasks
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 14 Oct 2026]

Title:AlphaDiana: A Measurement System for Agents in Verifiable Reasoning Tasks

View a PDF of the paper titled AlphaDiana: A Measurement System for Agents in Verifiable Reasoning Tasks, by Zhanke Zhou and 18 other authors

View PDF

Abstract:Agents pair reasoning models with harnesses that organize model calls, execute tools, load skill instructions, and retain history in memory. Understanding agent performance requires linking execution conditions to outcomes, behavior, and resource use. We introduce AlphaDiana, a measurement system with modular interfaces for datasets, agents, environments, and scorers. It preserves harness-native control loops while controlling file reuse and memory retention separately. AlphaDiana supports macro analyses of complete agents and micro interventions on agent components such as tools, skills, and memory under matched conditions. We study three open-source models and three open-source harnesses on five answer-based benchmarks, with two models also tested on two interactive benchmarks. We find that harnesses do not consistently improve the accuracy of reasoning: gains on questions unsolved by the model alone can be outweighed by losses on questions it answers correctly without tools. This inconsistency extends to component interventions: neither skill guidance nor retained history reliably improves accuracy. Behavior and output-token use must be assessed with correctness: low token entropy can accompany wrong answers, and less output per execution can mean more output tokens per correct answer when accuracy falls. AlphaDiana links answer correctness and execution status to traces and resource records for comparing agents and diagnosing failures under shared task and resource policies.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.20675 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.20675v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20675

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Zhanke Zhou [view email] [v1] Wed, 14 Oct 2026 14:04:48 UTC (3,312 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled AlphaDiana: A Measurement System for Agents in Verifiable Reasoning Tasks, by Zhanke Zhou and 18 other authors

View PDF

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.20675v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agents pair reasoning models with harnesses that organize model calls, execute tools, load skill instructions, and retain history i…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.