AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Agentic Evaluation of Copyright Law Compliance

Copyright-Bench benchmark evaluates LLM agents' compliance with copyright law in commercial tasks. Agents often choose copyrighted works despite public-domain alternatives, and open-weights models show increased violation rates under certain user preferences and time pressure.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Zheng Hui, Doni Bloomfield, Noam Kolt

-->

[Submitted on 23 Jul 2026]

Title:Agentic Evaluation of Copyright Law Compliance

View a PDF of the paper titled Agentic Evaluation of Copyright Law Compliance, by Zheng Hui and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly perform commercial tasks that involve retrieving external content such as images and, where appropriate, reproducing that content. LLM agents should comply with the law, including copyright law. Presently, however, we lack adequate frameworks to assess whether they do so in practice. To that end, we introduce \textbf{Copyright-Bench}, a benchmark designed to evaluate \textit{LLM agents' compliance with} \emph{copyright law}. Copyright-Bench is comprised of realistic commercial tasks---website development, merchandise design, and pitch deck production---that involve agents selecting between public-domain content (the use of which is \textit{legal}) and copyrighted content (the use of which is \textit{infringing} in this setting).The evaluation introduces prompt variations that simulate different user preferences, as well as time this http URL state-of-the-art LLM agents against a human baseline, we find that: (1) agents select copyrighted works despite the availability of public-domain alternatives; and (2) for open-weights models, violation rates increase in response to certain user preferences and simulated time pressure.

Comments: ICML 2026 Spotlight

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computers and Society (cs.CY)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.21799 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2607.21799v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.21799

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Zheng Hui [view email] [v1] Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:32:36 UTC (4,728 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Agentic Evaluation of Copyright Law Compliance, by Zheng Hui and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CY

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)