Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

AERIC: Anticipatory Hidden-State Monitoring for Implicit Harmful Dialogue

Summary

AERIC is a lightweight safety monitor that reads hidden states during decoding to anticipate implicit harmful content without extra forward passes. With only 387 trainable parameters, it outperforms larger models on multiple benchmarks and increases latency by just 2.34%.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Jihyung Park, Saleh Afroogh, Junfeng Jiao
AERIC: Anticipatory Hidden-State Monitoring for Implicit Harmful Dialogue
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.23974] AERIC: Anticipatory Hidden-State Monitoring for Implicit Harmful Dialogue

[Submitted on 13 May 2026]

Title:AERIC: Anticipatory Hidden-State Monitoring for Implicit Harmful Dialogue

View a PDF of the paper titled AERIC: Anticipatory Hidden-State Monitoring for Implicit Harmful Dialogue, by Jihyung Park and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Current language models create two safety challenges: risk must be detected early enough to avoid exposing harmful continuation, and the harmfulness itself may be implicit rather than signaled by overtly toxic text. Existing response-level guards are strong at judging completed text, and native streaming guards move closer to token time, but both settings leave open whether a lightweight monitor can anticipate implicit harmful drift from the generator's own internal trajectory. We study anticipatory same-pass monitoring, where a safety monitor may read hidden states produced during ordinary decoding but may not invoke an additional forward pass through the base model. We introduce AERIC, a transfer-oriented hidden-state approach for implicit harmful dialogue that combines short-horizon hazard forecasting, support-sensitive suppression, and prompt-conditioned residual scoring under a same-pass exponential moving average decision rule. The default linear monitor contains only 387 trainable head parameters. Against Qwen3GuardStream-4B on balanced benchmarks, AERIC improves AUROC from 0.6830 to 0.7143 on DiaSafety and from 0.8219 to 0.8582 on Harmful Advice. For promptlevel trigger benchmarks, we calibrate the AERIC threshold by a source-side safe-budget rule that maximizes trigger coverage while constraining the safe-trigger rate to at most 10%. Under that rule, trigger@64 reaches 0.6438 and 0.4656 on HarmBench DirectRequest and 0.6849 and 0.7363 on SocialHarmBench for Qwen and Gemma, respectively, withholding between 23.53 and 41.86 answer tokens on average. Same-pass deployment is also efficient: on a 63-prompt harmfulprompt fixed-generation benchmark aggregated over HarmBench DirectRequest and SocialHarmBench under Qwen3-8B, the monitor increases mean latency by only 2.34%, whereas Qwen3Guard-Stream-4B increases it by 79.40%.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.23974 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.23974v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.23974

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Jihyung Park [view email] [v1] Wed, 13 May 2026 14:18:29 UTC (356 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled AERIC: Anticipatory Hidden-State Monitoring for Implicit Harmful Dialogue, by Jihyung Park and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AERIC predicts harmful content early by analyzing the model's internal hidden states.
  • Combines short-horizon hazard forecasting, support-sensitive suppression, and prompt-conditioned residual scoring.
  • Improves AUROC to 0.7143 on DiaSafety and 0.8582 on Harmful Advice.
  • Latency increase is only 2.34%, compared to 79.40% for the baseline.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.