Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Aerial-R1: Reinforcing Aerial Reasoning and Segmentation in MLLMs

Summary

Aerial-R1 is the first aerial MLLM framework that reinforces visual reasoning for aerial reasoning and segmentation. Inspired by DeepSeek-R1, it introduces Hybrid-View Group Advantage-Weighted Regression (H-GAWR) to enforce consistency across views and penalize hallucinations on ambiguous inputs, leading to an explicit refusal mechanism. Experiments on the VSAI-Ref benchmark show significant gains in segmentation precision and reduced fatal hallucinations compared to SFT baselines.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Jisheng Dang, Huaiyuan Peng, Yixuan Wang, Kun Wang, Zhang Li, Tat-Seng Chua
Aerial-R1: Reinforcing Aerial Reasoning and Segmentation in MLLMs
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 19 Oct 2026]

Title:Aerial-R1: Reinforcing Aerial Reasoning and Segmentation in MLLMs

View a PDF of the paper titled Aerial-R1: Reinforcing Aerial Reasoning and Segmentation in MLLMs, by Jisheng Dang and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have revolutionized general visual perception, existing methods suffer from severe hallucination in the aerial domain, where extreme scale variations and visual ambiguity abound. Existing Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) paradigms force models to mimic ground truth without modeling uncertainty, often resulting in blind guessing on tiny or unrecognizable objects in aerial scenes. In this paper, we present Aerial-R1, the first aerial MLLM framework to reinforce visual reasoning capabilities for aerial reasoning and segmentation. Drawing inspiration from the reasoning-incentivizing mechanisms of DeepSeek-R1, we find that trustworthy perception stems from consistency across views, establishing a visual parallel to the Chain-of-Thought in logic. To effectively adapt policy optimization for non-autoregressive mask generation, we introduce Hybrid-View Group Advantage-Weighted Regression (H-GAWR). This strategy constructs dynamic groups of high-resolution and low-resolution views, seamlessly bridging group-relative advantage estimation with advantage-weighted policy extraction. By enforcing consensus on clear inputs and strictly penalizing hallucinations on ambiguous ones, Aerial-R1 develops an explicitly incentivized refusal mechanism. Extensive experiments on VSAI-Ref, the first aerial MLLM benchmark dedicated to jointly evaluating dense reasoning and hallucination robustness, demonstrate that Aerial-R1 significantly outperforms SFT baselines in segmentation precision while substantially mitigating fatal hallucinations in low-information scenarios, paving the way for more reliable and trustworthy aerial agents. Codes are available on this https URL.

Comments: 16 pages, 8 figures, including supplementary material

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.33056 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2610.33056v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.33056

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Huaiyuan Peng [view email] [v1] Mon, 19 Oct 2026 08:44:04 UTC (3,395 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Aerial-R1: Reinforcing Aerial Reasoning and Segmentation in MLLMs, by Jisheng Dang and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • First reinforcement learning framework for aerial MLLMs targeting reasoning and segmentation
  • H-GAWR adapts policy optimization for non-autoregressive mask generation using dynamic high/low-resolution view groups
  • Explicit refusal mechanism incentivized by penalizing hallucinations on ambiguous inputs
  • Outperforms SFT baselines on the new VSAI-Ref benchmark for dense reasoning and hallucination robustness

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.