Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source3 min read

AdaGATE: Adaptive Gap-Aware Token-Efficient Evidence Assembly for Multi-Hop Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Summary

AdaGATE is a training-free evidence controller for multi-hop RAG that frames evidence selection as a token-constrained repair problem. It combines entity-centric gap tracking, targeted micro-query generation, and a utility-based selection mechanism balancing gap coverage, corroboration, novelty, redundancy, and relevance. On HotpotQA, it achieves best evidence F1 of 62.3% on clean data and 71.2% under redundancy injection, using 2.6x fewer tokens than Adaptive-k.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Yilin Guo, Yinshan Wang, Yixuan Wang
AdaGATE: Adaptive Gap-Aware Token-Efficient Evidence Assembly for Multi-Hop Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.05245] AdaGATE: Adaptive Gap-Aware Token-Efficient Evidence Assembly for Multi-Hop Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Skip to main content

Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.

We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate

> cs > arXiv:2605.05245

Help | Advanced Search

All fields Title Author Abstract Comments Journal reference ACM classification MSC classification Report number arXiv identifier DOI ORCID arXiv author ID Help pages Full text

Search

GO

quick links

Login

Help Pages

About

-->

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2605.05245 (cs)

[Submitted on 4 May 2026]

Title:AdaGATE: Adaptive Gap-Aware Token-Efficient Evidence Assembly for Multi-Hop Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Authors:Yilin Guo, Yinshan Wang, Yixuan Wang

View a PDF of the paper titled AdaGATE: Adaptive Gap-Aware Token-Efficient Evidence Assembly for Multi-Hop Retrieval-Augmented Generation, by Yilin Guo and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) remains brittle on multi-hop questions in realistic deployment settings, where retrieved evidence may be noisy or redundant and only limited context can be passed to the generator. Existing controllers address parts of this problem, but typically either expand context additively, select from a fixed top-k set, or optimize relevance without explicitly repairing missing bridge facts. We propose AdaGATE, a training-free evidence controller for multi-hop RAG that frames evidence selection as a token-constrained repair problem. AdaGATE combines entity centric gap tracking, targeted micro-query generation, and a utility based selection mechanism that balances gap coverage, corroboration, novelty, redundancy, and direct question relevance. We evaluate AdaGATE on HotpotQA under clean, redundancy, and noise injected retrieval conditions. Across all three settings, AdaGATE achieves the best evidence F1 among the compared controllers, reaching 62.3% on clean data and 71.2% under redundancy injection, while using 2.6x fewer input tokens than Adaptive-k. These results suggest that explicit gap-aware repair, combined with token-efficient evidence selection, improves robustness in multi-hop RAG under imperfect retrieval. Our code and evaluation pipeline are available at this https URL.

Comments: 10 pages, 4 figures, 2 tables

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.05245 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.05245v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.05245

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Yilin Guo [view email] [v1] Mon, 4 May 2026 14:45:49 UTC (187 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled AdaGATE: Adaptive Gap-Aware Token-Efficient Evidence Assembly for Multi-Hop Retrieval-Augmented Generation, by Yilin Guo and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.IR

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

About

Help

contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact

subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe

Copyright

Privacy Policy

Web Accessibility Assistance

arXiv Operational Status

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • AdaGATE addresses multi-hop RAG brittleness by explicitly repairing missing bridge facts.
  • It uses token-efficient evidence selection without training.
  • Achieves 62.3% F1 on clean data and 71.2% under redundancy injection, with 2.6x fewer tokens.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.