Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Actively Resolving Contextual Uncertainty for Underspecified Tasks in Natural Language

Summary

arXiv:2609.30428v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Foundation models provide robots with the ability to interpret natural language and reason about environmental context, yet most language-conditioned policies assume that goals are well-specified and that task-relevant information is provided upfront via a prior map. Operating in unfamiliar environments with underspecified tasks entails high contextual uncertainty: the robot must jointly infer what constitutes task success, what constitutes relevant information, and where (or whether) that information exists. We address these limitations via CLUE (Closed-Loop contextual Uncertainty rEsolution), a framework for actively resolving contextual uncertainty given underspecified tasks in natural language. CLUE uses an LLM-derived policy to hypothes…

SourcearXiv RoboticsAuthor: Zachary Ravichandran, Jonathan Diller, Fernando Cladera, Varun Murali, George J. Pappas, Vijay Kumar
Actively Resolving Contextual Uncertainty for Underspecified Tasks in Natural Language
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 24 Sep 2026]

Title:Actively Resolving Contextual Uncertainty for Underspecified Tasks in Natural Language

View a PDF of the paper titled Actively Resolving Contextual Uncertainty for Underspecified Tasks in Natural Language, by Zachary Ravichandran and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Foundation models provide robots with the ability to interpret natural language and reason about environmental context, yet most language-conditioned policies assume that goals are well-specified and that task-relevant information is provided upfront via a prior map. Operating in unfamiliar environments with underspecified tasks entails high contextual uncertainty: the robot must jointly infer what constitutes task success, what constitutes relevant information, and where (or whether) that information exists. We address these limitations via CLUE (Closed-Loop contextual Uncertainty rEsolution), a framework for actively resolving contextual uncertainty given underspecified tasks in natural language. CLUE uses an LLM-derived policy to hypothesize task-relevant concepts and potential plans. It then uses a language-embedded map, which is constructed online, to ground these hypotheses into actions. The policy sequentially evaluates hypotheses via closed-loop environment interaction and refines its plans as it gathers new information. We deploy CLUE on a Boston Dynamics Spot across three real indoor and outdoor environments spanning 15 tasks that require object disambiguation, functional inference, and occlusion reasoning. CLUE achieves a success rate within 7 percentage points of an oracle policy and outperforms an LLM-enabled planner without closed-loop feedback by a 4x margin. Supporting experiments demonstrate that simply building and then querying a language-enriched map is insufficient to resolve complex contextual planning tasks; these approaches achieve roughly one third the success rate of CLUE while requiring over 10x more VLM tokens. We provide additional information at this https URL.

Comments: Accepted to the International Symposium of Robotics Research (ISRR) 2026

Subjects:

Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.30428 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.30428v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30428

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Zachary Ravichandran [view email] [v1] Thu, 24 Sep 2026 18:22:15 UTC (4,908 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Actively Resolving Contextual Uncertainty for Underspecified Tasks in Natural Language, by Zachary Ravichandran and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.RO

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.30428v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Foundation models provide robots with the ability to interpret natural language and reason about environmental context, yet most la…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.