AI News HubLIVE
站內改寫2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:When Irrelevant Text Matters: Affine Margin Shifts in Multimodal Large Language Models

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2608.19208v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are frequently exposed to auxiliary textual context, the impact of which on visually grounded tasks remains underexplored. In this paper, we investigate the influence of task-irrelevant context by formulating it as a controlled intervention within a binary visual judgment framework. By maintaining an invariant prompt structure while varying auxiliary inputs, we observe that irrelevant text consistently biases model predictions across diverse benchmarks. To move beyond performance metrics, we characterize this sensitivity through a decision margin defined by the log-probability difference between binary candidates. Our analysis reveals a robust geometric regularity: contextconditioned margins follow a consistent affine transformation of their context-free counterparts. This finding demonstrates that irrelevant context does not manifest as unstructured stochastic noise but as a estimable distortion of model preference. We further interpret the fitted affine parameters as metrics for visual commitment preservation and directional answer bias. These findings provide a margin-level diagnostic view of irrelevant-context effects in MLLMs and offer a basis for future studies on noisy-context robustness

來源arXiv Computational Linguistics作者: Yinfeng Wang, Zhiyuan Yao, Zheren Fu, Lei Zhang, Zhendong Mao

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

--> [Submitted on 12 Jun 2026] Title:When Irrelevant Text Matters: Affine Margin Shifts in Multimodal Large Language Models View a PDF of the paper titled When Irrelevant Text Matters: Affine Margin Shifts in Multimodal Large Language Models, by Yinfeng Wang and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are frequently exposed to auxiliary textual context, the impact of which on visually grounded tasks remains underexplored. In this paper, we investigate the influence of task-irrelevant context by formulating it as a controlled intervention within a binary visual judgment framework. By maintaining an invariant prompt structure while varying auxiliary inputs, we observe that irrelevant text consistently biases model predictions across diverse benchmarks. To move beyond performance metrics, we characterize this sensitivity through a decision margin defined by the log-probability difference between binary candidates. Our analysis reveals a robust geometric regularity: contextconditioned margins follow a consistent affine transformation of their context-free counterparts. This finding demonstrates that irrelevant context does not manifest as unstructured stochastic noise but as a estimable distortion of model preference. We further interpret the fitted affine parameters as metrics for visual commitment preservation and directional answer bias. These findings provide a margin-level diagnostic view of irrelevant-context effects in MLLMs and offer a basis for future studies on noisy-context robustness Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) Cite as: arXiv:2608.19208 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2608.19208v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19208 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Yinfeng Wang [view email] [v1] Fri, 12 Jun 2026 02:49:01 UTC (1,127 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled When Irrelevant Text Matters: Affine Margin Shifts in Multimodal Large Language Models, by Yinfeng Wang and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.CV References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)