跳到主要内容
AI News HubLIVE
来源内容 · 翻译待补全2 分钟阅读

待翻译:When better traffic forecasts fail to improve signal control: a layered diagnostic study of forecast-to-decision value

文章摘要

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源摘要,待恢复后补全翻译:arXiv:2610.06992v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Improved traffic forecasts do not necessarily yield better signal-control decisions. We investigate this gap through a layered diagnostic study using 29 days of reconstructed demand from Xuancheng, China, with seven dates reserved for testing. The framework evaluates point forecasts, conformal intervals, dependence-aware scenarios, and matched closed-loop controllers. Entry-level and movement-level forecasts reduce mean absolute error by 4.03% and 3.92%, respectively, relative to historical means. A nominal 90% conformal interval achieves 90.72% marginal coverage but only 75.66% on an ex-post high-demand subset. Interface audits identify decision-time leakage and reveal that only two of nine controlled intersectio…

来源arXiv AI作者: Jianing Long, Xiaobin Li, Wuming Lei, Weiguang Wang
待翻译:When better traffic forecasts fail to improve signal control: a layered diagnostic study of forecast-to-decision value
报告错误

纠错通道尚未开通,可先复制下方文章信息留存。

查看更正说明
直接读正文

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源正文,待恢复后补全翻译。

[Submitted on 4 Oct 2026] Title:When better traffic forecasts fail to improve signal control: a layered diagnostic study of forecast-to-decision value View a PDF of the paper titled When better traffic forecasts fail to improve signal control: a layered diagnostic study of forecast-to-decision value, by Jianing Long and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Improved traffic forecasts do not necessarily yield better signal-control decisions. We investigate this gap through a layered diagnostic study using 29 days of reconstructed demand from Xuancheng, China, with seven dates reserved for testing. The framework evaluates point forecasts, conformal intervals, dependence-aware scenarios, and matched closed-loop controllers. Entry-level and movement-level forecasts reduce mean absolute error by 4.03% and 3.92%, respectively, relative to historical means. A nominal 90% conformal interval achieves 90.72% marginal coverage but only 75.66% on an ex-post high-demand subset. Interface audits identify decision-time leakage and reveal that only two of nine controlled intersections offer multiple effective actions. We correct the temporal interface and compare causal forecasts with a five-second event oracle using exhaustive joint-action search. A synthetic positive control demonstrates that future information can reduce the internal rollout cost by 61.5%. On the frozen test dates, however, causal forecasts and the event oracle increase queue vehicle?seconds by 6.09% and 3.39% relative to the matched no-future rollout, while the oracle reduces spillback exposure by 3.78%; paired-day bootstrap intervals cross zero. These findings indicate that forecast value depends on temporal observability, action identifiability, dynamics consistency, and objective alignment. The proposed protocol provides a practical way to diagnose where predictive improvements fail to translate into operational benefits. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2610.06992 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2610.06992v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.06992 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Xiaobin Li [view email] [v1] Sun, 4 Oct 2026 07:39:32 UTC (430 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled When better traffic forecasts fail to improve signal control: a layered diagnostic study of forecast-to-decision value, by Jianing Long and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展开要点与分析

文章情报

研究者进阶

要点

  • AI 服务暂时不可用,系统已先保留来源内容与降级元数据。
  • arXiv:2610.06992v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Improved traffic forecasts do not necessarily yield better signal-control decisions. We investigate this gap through a layered diag…

要点与分析由自动化流程生成,可能有误,请结合原始来源核实。