跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:What Should Embodied Agents Remember? Benchmarking and Evaluating Memory Modality for Embodied Agents

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2610.12561v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Memory allows large language model (LLM) agents to use past experience, often stored as textual records, when responding to requests. For embodied agents that control robots, visual and spatial observations introduce a broader choice of memory modalities, affecting both the information available for subsequent tasks and the model inference costs of constructing and using memory. We introduce MeMoREval, a benchmark for studying this problem through a controlled experience-request protocol. Agents first experience a sequence of events without knowing the subsequent tasks, and subsequently they use memory to respond to information and action requests without receiving new observations. The benchmark comprises 53 task…

來源arXiv Robotics作者: Junxiang Wang, Yuchen Liu, Yi Wu, Guofei Chen, Nir Pechuk, Tao Chen, Zackory Erickson, Yuzhe Qin, Tianyu Li
待翻譯:What Should Embodied Agents Remember? Benchmarking and Evaluating Memory Modality for Embodied Agents
回報錯誤

更正管道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 8 Oct 2026] Title:What Should Embodied Agents Remember? Benchmarking and Evaluating Memory Modality for Embodied Agents View a PDF of the paper titled What Should Embodied Agents Remember? Benchmarking and Evaluating Memory Modality for Embodied Agents, by Junxiang Wang and 8 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Memory allows large language model (LLM) agents to use past experience, often stored as textual records, when responding to requests. For embodied agents that control robots, visual and spatial observations introduce a broader choice of memory modalities, affecting both the information available for subsequent tasks and the model inference costs of constructing and using memory. We introduce MeMoREval, a benchmark for studying this problem through a controlled experience-request protocol. Agents first experience a sequence of events without knowing the subsequent tasks, and subsequently they use memory to respond to information and action requests without receiving new observations. The benchmark comprises 53 tasks across four simulated indoor environments and measures task success alongside the inference costs of memory construction and use. Our reference evaluations reveal that storing frames outperforms storing generated descriptions at lower write-time inference cost for the primary model, while storing frames with scene graphs achieves the highest aggregate task success for every tested model. Extensions to accumulated experience, selective frame retention, and visual input to memory writers demonstrate how the benchmark accommodates further memory-design investigations. Two physical-robot demonstrations establish the feasibility of applying its protocol beyond simulation. Comments: 16 pages, 6 figures, 8 tables Subjects: Robotics (cs.RO) Cite as: arXiv:2610.12561 [cs.RO] (or arXiv:2610.12561v1 [cs.RO] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.12561 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Junxiang Wang [view email] [v1] Thu, 8 Oct 2026 18:00:03 UTC (11,919 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled What Should Embodied Agents Remember? Benchmarking and Evaluating Memory Modality for Embodied Agents, by Junxiang Wang and 8 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.RO new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

工程師進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級後設資料。
  • arXiv:2610.12561v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Memory allows large language model (LLM) agents to use past experience, often stored as textual records, when responding to request…

技術影響

可能影響 Agent 架構、工具呼叫、工作流自動化和產品整合。

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。