跳到主要内容
AI News HubLIVE
来源内容 · 翻译待补全2 分钟阅读

待翻译:Towards an Argumentative Foundation for Evaluative AI

文章摘要

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源摘要,待恢复后补全翻译:arXiv:2608.07473v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluative AI (EAI) has been recently proposed as a way to support human decision-making, not by producing a single recommendation, but by presenting competing hypotheses together with evidence for and against each. In this position paper, we advocate (computational) argumentation as a particularly suitable paradigm to provide a formal, computable foundation for forms of EAI that are explainable and contestable, setting the ground for a long-term research agenda towards distributed and human-centred EAI systems.

来源arXiv AI作者: Xiang Yin, Tim Miller, Nico Potyka, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni
待翻译:Towards an Argumentative Foundation for Evaluative AI
报告错误

纠错通道尚未开通,可先复制下方文章信息留存。

查看更正说明
直接读正文

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源正文,待恢复后补全翻译。

--> [Submitted on 25 Apr 2026] Title:Towards an Argumentative Foundation for Evaluative AI View a PDF of the paper titled Towards an Argumentative Foundation for Evaluative AI, by Xiang Yin and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Evaluative AI (EAI) has been recently proposed as a way to support human decision-making, not by producing a single recommendation, but by presenting competing hypotheses together with evidence for and against each. In this position paper, we advocate (computational) argumentation as a particularly suitable paradigm to provide a formal, computable foundation for forms of EAI that are explainable and contestable, setting the ground for a long-term research agenda towards distributed and human-centred EAI systems. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA) Cite as: arXiv:2608.07473 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2608.07473v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.07473 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Xiang Yin [view email] [v1] Sat, 25 Apr 2026 13:26:11 UTC (131 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Towards an Argumentative Foundation for Evaluative AI, by Xiang Yin and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.MA References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展开要点与分析

文章情报

工程师进阶

要点

  • AI 服务暂时不可用,系统已先保留来源内容与降级元数据。
  • arXiv:2608.07473v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluative AI (EAI) has been recently proposed as a way to support human decision-making, not by producing a single recommendation,…

要点与分析由自动化流程生成,可能有误,请结合原始来源核实。