AI 服务暂时不可用，以下为来源正文，待恢复后补全翻译。
[Submitted on 25 Mar 2026] Title:Tokka-Bench: Evaluating Tokenizers Across 100 Natural and 20 Programming Languages View a PDF of the paper titled Tokka-Bench: Evaluating Tokenizers Across 100 Natural and 20 Programming Languages, by Ben Gubler View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large language models rely on subword tokenizers whose quality varies across languages, yet no standardized multi-metric framework exists for broad comparative evaluation. We introduce Tokka-Bench, an open-source framework that evaluates tokenizers on five complementary metrics -- bytes per token, unique token coverage, subword fertility, word-split rate, and vocabulary composition -- across 100 natural languages (30+ scripts) and 20 programming languages, using language-aware segmentation adapted to each writing system. Comparing seven BPE tokenizers (GPT-2, GPT-4, gpt-oss, Llama 3.1, Gemma 3, Qwen3, and Kimi K2) within individual languages, we find that vocabulary allocation strategy matters more than raw vocabulary size, and that programming-language efficiency has converged among recent tokenizers despite divergent natural-language profiles. The framework, data, and interactive dashboard are publicly available. Comments: 5 pages, 5 figures. Code and data: this https URL. Interactive dashboard: this https URL Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2610.08794 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2610.08794v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.08794 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Ben Gubler [view email] [v1] Wed, 25 Mar 2026 21:01:32 UTC (47 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Tokka-Bench: Evaluating Tokenizers Across 100 Natural and 20 Programming Languages, by Ben Gubler View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)