跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:Token Signatures of Code: Comparing Coding Behaviors Across Large Language Models

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2609.22097v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The evaluation of large language models (LLMs) on coding tasks has primarily focused on performance metrics such as pass@k. As LLMs continue to advance, many models now meet baseline performance requirements, reducing the discriminative power of performance-based evaluation alone. Yet a key question remains largely unexplored: how do LLMs differ in their coding behavior? We propose CLIC (Code Learning for Identification and Comparison), a visual analytics approach that characterizes LLM coding behavior through token-frequency analysis. CLIC represents each code sample as a feature vector of token frequencies and trains an interpretable decision tree to separate two LLMs' code sets. Beyond classification accuracy,…

來源arXiv Computational Linguistics作者: Junpeng Wang, Yuzhong Chen, Menghai Pan, Uday Singh Saini, Yiwei Cai
待翻譯:Token Signatures of Code: Comparing Coding Behaviors Across Large Language Models
回報錯誤

更正管道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 12 Aug 2026] Title:Token Signatures of Code: Comparing Coding Behaviors Across Large Language Models View a PDF of the paper titled Token Signatures of Code: Comparing Coding Behaviors Across Large Language Models, by Junpeng Wang and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:The evaluation of large language models (LLMs) on coding tasks has primarily focused on performance metrics such as pass@k. As LLMs continue to advance, many models now meet baseline performance requirements, reducing the discriminative power of performance-based evaluation alone. Yet a key question remains largely unexplored: how do LLMs differ in their coding behavior? We propose CLIC (Code Learning for Identification and Comparison), a visual analytics approach that characterizes LLM coding behavior through token-frequency analysis. CLIC represents each code sample as a feature vector of token frequencies and trains an interpretable decision tree to separate two LLMs' code sets. Beyond classification accuracy, we define two new metrics: robustness, which measures whether the two LLMs remain distinguishable as their most-discriminative tokens are progressively removed, and concentration, which measures whether the difference is driven by a few dominant tokens or spread across many. Interpreting numerous pairwise comparisons (across LLM pairs, tasks, and tokenization levels) and tracing the full analytical chain form an inherently multi-scale, hypothesis-driven exploration task. We therefore develop an interactive visual analytics system to navigate the comparison landscape, identify pairs of interest, and drill down into discriminative tokens and their code contexts. Case studies comparing 10 LLMs across 22 Kaggle ML tasks reveal actionable insights for LLM selection and prompt engineering. Comments: 11 pages, 9 figures Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Software Engineering (cs.SE) Cite as: arXiv:2609.22097 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2609.22097v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22097 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Junpeng Wang [view email] [v1] Wed, 12 Aug 2026 00:48:45 UTC (3,017 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Token Signatures of Code: Comparing Coding Behaviors Across Large Language Models, by Junpeng Wang and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.LG cs.SE References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

投資人進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級後設資料。
  • arXiv:2609.22097v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The evaluation of large language models (LLMs) on coding tasks has primarily focused on performance metrics such as pass@k. As LLMs…

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。