待翻譯：There are no lossless transformations of natural-language text
AI 服務暫時不可用，以下為來源摘要，待恢復後補全翻譯：<p><strong><a href="https://sophiebits.com/2026/06/25/there-are-no-lossless-transformations-of-natural-language-text">There are no lossless transformations of natural-language text</a></strong></p> Sophie Alpert shares her "internal policy on acceptable use of AI writing by engineers". It's a short read (supporting its own recommendations) and really good.</p> <p>If you chose to have LLMs help massage your writing the following rule seems crucial to me:</p> <blockquote> <p><strong>You must stand behind every idea and every sentence in your docs</strong>. It is your responsibility to make sure that the entire document is representative of your own thoughts before you share it. If a reviewer asks, “What did you mean by this line?”, it’s not acceptable to reply with “Oh sorry, AI wrote that, just ignore it.” You will confuse your readers (and waste their time) if you present them things that are not genuinely representative of your thoughts.</p> </blockquote> <p>The "no lossless transformations" idea from the post title is expanded on here:</p> <blockquote> <p>There are no lossless transformations of natural-language text — every rewrite and rephrase changes the meaning of your writing, and if this is done by an entity that doesn’t have the most detailed mental representation of what you personally were trying to communicate, information will be lost.</p> </blockquote> <p>Tags: <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/writing">writing</a>, <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/ai">ai</a>, <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/generative-ai">generative-ai</a>, <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/llms">llms</a>, <a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/ai-misuse">ai-misuse</a></p>
AI 服務暫時不可用，以下為來源正文，待恢復後補全翻譯。
There are no lossless transformations of natural-language text Simon Willison’s Weblog Subscribe 11th August 2026 - Link Blog There are no lossless transformations of natural-language text. Sophie Alpert shares her "internal policy on acceptable use of AI writing by engineers". It's a short read (supporting its own recommendations) and really good. If you chose to have LLMs help massage your writing the following rule seems crucial to me: You must stand behind every idea and every sentence in your docs. It is your responsibility to make sure that the entire document is representative of your own thoughts before you share it. If a reviewer asks, “What did you mean by this line?”, it’s not acceptable to reply with “Oh sorry, AI wrote that, just ignore it.” You will confuse your readers (and waste their time) if you present them things that are not genuinely representative of your thoughts. The "no lossless transformations" idea from the post title is expanded on here: There are no lossless transformations of natural-language text — every rewrite and rephrase changes the meaning of your writing, and if this is done by an entity that doesn’t have the most detailed mental representation of what you personally were trying to communicate, information will be lost. Recent articles Now we have a timeline of the OpenAI accidental attack against Hugging Face - 7th August 2026 One-shotting a Raccoon Heist game using Claude Fable 5 - 5th August 2026 New release of LLM adds support for reasoning traces, OpenAI Responses, server-side tools, and smarter logging - 4th August 2026 This is a link post by Simon Willison, posted on 11th August 2026. writing 33 ai 2,182 generative-ai 1,933 llms 1,900 ai-misuse 61 Monthly briefing Sponsor me for $10/month and get a curated email digest of the month's most important LLM developments. Pay me to send you less! Sponsor & subscribe Disclosures Colophon © 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026