跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
站內改寫2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2609.10951v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans…

來源arXiv Robotics作者: Menuka Ghalan, Charles Rodgers, Zachary D. Asher
待翻譯:Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove
回報錯誤

更正管道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 10 Sep 2026] Title:Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove View a PDF of the paper titled Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove, by Menuka Ghalan and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving. Comments: 10 pages, 7 figures, 2 tables Subjects: Robotics (cs.RO); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2609.10951 [cs.RO] (or arXiv:2609.10951v1 [cs.RO] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.10951 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Zachary Asher [view email] [v1] Thu, 10 Sep 2026 01:19:13 UTC (1,063 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove, by Menuka Ghalan and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.RO new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

工程師進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級後設資料。
  • arXiv:2609.10951v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world…

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。