跳到主要内容
AI News HubLIVE
来源内容 · 翻译待补全3 分钟阅读

待翻译:SWE-Duel: Towards a Self-Scaling Arena for Coding Agents

文章摘要

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源摘要,待恢复后补全翻译:arXiv:2610.12569v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Static coding benchmarks are fixed at release. Over time their tasks leak into training data, and stronger agents eventually saturate them. We argue that a benchmark should instead aim to be self-scaling: its tasks and oracles are created at evaluation time, so no content exists in advance to leak, and its difficulty is set by the participating agents rather than fixed at release. We introduce SWE-Duel, an arena in which two coding agents evaluate each other over mirrored Red-Blue turns. In each turn, the Red agent works on a real repository across three context-isolated sessions. It proposes and implements a new feature with feature tests, then embeds a subtle bug in that feature along with sealed bug-triggering…

来源arXiv Computational Linguistics作者: Wei Minn, Zhensu Sun, Lwin Khin Shar, David Lo
待翻译:SWE-Duel: Towards a Self-Scaling Arena for Coding Agents
报告错误

纠错通道尚未开通,可先复制下方文章信息留存。

查看更正说明
直接读正文

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源正文,待恢复后补全翻译。

[Submitted on 8 Oct 2026] Title:SWE-Duel: Towards a Self-Scaling Arena for Coding Agents View a PDF of the paper titled SWE-Duel: Towards a Self-Scaling Arena for Coding Agents, by Wei Minn and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Static coding benchmarks are fixed at release. Over time their tasks leak into training data, and stronger agents eventually saturate them. We argue that a benchmark should instead aim to be self-scaling: its tasks and oracles are created at evaluation time, so no content exists in advance to leak, and its difficulty is set by the participating agents rather than fixed at release. We introduce SWE-Duel, an arena in which two coding agents evaluate each other over mirrored Red-Blue turns. In each turn, the Red agent works on a real repository across three context-isolated sessions. It proposes and implements a new feature with feature tests, then embeds a subtle bug in that feature along with sealed bug-triggering tests. The resulting pull request is admitted only if (1) it passes the feature tests and the repository's existing tests while failing exactly the bug tests, and (2) a fresh session of the same agent can repair the bug blind, which rules out unsolvable tasks. The Blue agent then reviews the pull request without being told a bug exists. It wins only if its revision passes all three test suites, and then the two agents swap roles. We run a tournament among 11 model-harness participants on 15 repositories in five languages for 1,500 turns. The leaders win in different ways. GPT-5.5 with Codex CLI ranks first as the strongest solver, repairing 98.3% of the defects it reviews. Claude Opus 4.8 with mini-swe-agent ranks second as the strongest task author, with a 27.3% Red win rate. Finally, within one model family, tasks written by the newest version defeat a fixed-reference solver far more often than those of older versions (42.9% vs. 4.0%), giving preliminary evidence that task difficulty scales with task authoring capability. Comments: Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2027 Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Software Engineering (cs.SE) MSC classes: I.2, D.2 Cite as: arXiv:2610.12569 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2610.12569v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.12569 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Wei Minn [view email] [v1] Thu, 8 Oct 2026 18:01:00 UTC (755 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled SWE-Duel: Towards a Self-Scaling Arena for Coding Agents, by Wei Minn and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs cs.SE References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展开要点与分析

文章情报

工程师进阶

要点

  • AI 服务暂时不可用,系统已先保留来源内容与降级元数据。
  • arXiv:2610.12569v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Static coding benchmarks are fixed at release. Over time their tasks leak into training data, and stronger agents eventually satura…

要点与分析由自动化流程生成,可能有误,请结合原始来源核实。