翻訳待ち：SLMs as Multi-Agent Routers: A Progressive SFT and Reinforcement Learning Approach
AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。ソース概要：arXiv:2608.00030v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Specialised retrieval agents typically surface higher quality results than general-purpose search, but selecting the optimal agent for a given query remains an open problem. Current approaches route queries based on inferred topic or intent, however intent-based selection is fundamentally limited: it does not incorporate signal from retrieved content, and cannot detect when a topically aligned agent produces low-relevance results. We address this by training a small language model via supervised fine-tuning followed by reinforcement learning to jointly perform agent selection and structured parameter generation for downstream tool calls, using a hierarchical reward function grounded in retrieval relevance along with query-agent topic alignment. This enables the model to learn task-dependent agent suitability from retrieval performance: which agents reliably yield high-relevance results for which query distributions, and when to redirect queries away from specialised agents despite surface-level topical overlap. On a targeted subset of such agent-query mismatches, the trained model achieves an NDCG@10 of 0.918 compared to 0.539 and 0.490 for two LLM baselines (Amazon Nova Lite and Claude Haiku 4.5) that route on intent alone. Overall, it achieves a mean NDCG@10 of 0.771 (+0.177 over Nova Lite, +0.219 over Haiku) with a mean selection latency of 120.1ms, an 82.4% reduction over Nova Lite.
AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。
--> [Submitted on 15 Jul 2026] Title:SLMs as Multi-Agent Routers: A Progressive SFT and Reinforcement Learning Approach View a PDF of the paper titled SLMs as Multi-Agent Routers: A Progressive SFT and Reinforcement Learning Approach, by Gayathri V Kondapalli and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Specialised retrieval agents typically surface higher quality results than general-purpose search, but selecting the optimal agent for a given query remains an open problem. Current approaches route queries based on inferred topic or intent, however intent-based selection is fundamentally limited: it does not incorporate signal from retrieved content, and cannot detect when a topically aligned agent produces low-relevance results. We address this by training a small language model via supervised fine-tuning followed by reinforcement learning to jointly perform agent selection and structured parameter generation for downstream tool calls, using a hierarchical reward function grounded in retrieval relevance along with query-agent topic alignment. This enables the model to learn task-dependent agent suitability from retrieval performance: which agents reliably yield high-relevance results for which query distributions, and when to redirect queries away from specialised agents despite surface-level topical overlap. On a targeted subset of such agent-query mismatches, the trained model achieves an NDCG@10 of 0.918 compared to 0.539 and 0.490 for two LLM baselines (Amazon Nova Lite and Claude Haiku 4.5) that route on intent alone. Overall, it achieves a mean NDCG@10 of 0.771 (+0.177 over Nova Lite, +0.219 over Haiku) with a mean selection latency of 120.1ms, an 82.4% reduction over Nova Lite. Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2608.00030 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2608.00030v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.00030 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Venkatashesha Gayathri Kondapalli [view email] [v1] Wed, 15 Jul 2026 11:11:39 UTC (129 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled SLMs as Multi-Agent Routers: A Progressive SFT and Reinforcement Learning Approach, by Gayathri V Kondapalli and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)