本文にスキップ
AI News HubLIVE
原典の内容 · 翻訳・分析待ち2 分で読了

翻訳待ち:SkillEval: Learning Interpretable Ability Profiles of LLMs via Cognitive Diagnosis Models

記事の要約

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。ソース概要:arXiv:2610.28767v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current evaluation of LLMs on benchmarks typically aggregates performance over individual examples into a single scalar score. This approach is overly coarse and ignores the diverse scope of skills covered by benchmark datasets. To address this limitation and better exploit benchmark data, we propose SkillEval, a new evaluation framework that performs cross-model, skill-level analysis. The framework integrates advances from two areas: (1) it leverages the meta-cognitive capabilities of LLMs to automatically discover interpretable skills from questions, and (2) it applies cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) from psychometrics to estimate per-skill abilities of LLMs. We conduct experiments on 3,811 LLMs ev…

ソースarXiv Computational Linguistics著者: Berke Arda, Peng Cui, Qiaoyuan Zheng, Rudolf Debelak, Mubashara Akhtar, Mrinmaya Sachan
翻訳待ち:SkillEval: Learning Interpretable Ability Profiles of LLMs via Cognitive Diagnosis Models
誤りを報告

訂正窓口はまだ利用できません。記事情報をコピーして保存できます。

訂正案内
本文へ

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。

[Submitted on 20 Oct 2026] Title:SkillEval: Learning Interpretable Ability Profiles of LLMs via Cognitive Diagnosis Models View a PDF of the paper titled SkillEval: Learning Interpretable Ability Profiles of LLMs via Cognitive Diagnosis Models, by Berke Arda and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Current evaluation of LLMs on benchmarks typically aggregates performance over individual examples into a single scalar score. This approach is overly coarse and ignores the diverse scope of skills covered by benchmark datasets. To address this limitation and better exploit benchmark data, we propose SkillEval, a new evaluation framework that performs cross-model, skill-level analysis. The framework integrates advances from two areas: (1) it leverages the meta-cognitive capabilities of LLMs to automatically discover interpretable skills from questions, and (2) it applies cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) from psychometrics to estimate per-skill abilities of LLMs. We conduct experiments on 3,811 LLMs evaluated on 9,523 items across five benchmarks spanning diverse domains (MATH, BBH, GPQA, MuSR, IFEval). Compared to the traditional average-based evaluation paradigm, SkillEval produces reliable, more calibrated and informative yet concise model profiles that more accurately predict model behavior on unseen items. We also demonstrate the utility of SkillEval in two downstream tasks: (1) LLM routing, which dynamically assigns each query to a capable but efficient model, reducing inference cost by over 60% while achieving improved performance, and (2) Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT), where an unseen model can be efficiently evaluated using a trained CDM. Furthermore, we show that these skill profiles provide useful insights, for example, how benchmarks share skills and how instruction-tuned models differ from their base models. Comments: 24 pages, 9 figures, 11 tables. Code: this https URL Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2610.28767 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2610.28767v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.28767 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Berke Arda [view email] [v1] Tue, 20 Oct 2026 18:06:47 UTC (409 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled SkillEval: Learning Interpretable Ability Profiles of LLMs via Cognitive Diagnosis Models, by Berke Arda and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.LG References & Citations SciX Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

要点と分析を開く

記事インテリジェンス

投資家上級

要点

  • AI 生成が一時的に利用できないため、ソース内容とフォールバックメタデータを保存しました。
  • arXiv:2610.28767v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current evaluation of LLMs on benchmarks typically aggregates performance over individual examples into a single scalar score. This…

要点と分析は自動生成され、誤りを含む場合があります。原典をご確認ください。