翻訳待ち：Sensorless damage-safe grasping
AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。ソース概要：arXiv:2608.23983v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Robotic fruit harvesting must hold produce securely without bruising it, yet compression stiffness varies several-fold with ripeness within a single species, so no fixed grip force spans the range. Rather than tune force, we bound deformation: a controller closes the gripper until the object's estimated compression strain reaches a user-specified limit $\varepsilon$, using only the encoder position and motor-effort signal on every servo gripper---no tactile or force-torque sensor. Dividing an effort-based contact force by a lower bound on object stiffness makes the stop provably conservative---true compression stays at or below $\varepsilon$---for any $\varepsilon$ above a contact-detection strain floor we identify and quantify: robust detection itself spends compression, linearly in closing speed, making speed an explicit throughput--gentleness knob. Unlike a hand-tuned force threshold, $\varepsilon$ is a certified, size-scaling, operator-interpretable damage limit, and a ready safe-action parameter for learned grasping policies. In MuJoCo simulation over a realistic fruit-stiffness range, under a sensor-noise model calibrated to the real servo, the controller holds $\ge 98\,\%$ grasp at $0\,\%$ damage across all medium-to-firm stiffnesses for the entire certified $\varepsilon$ range, which neither fixed-force baseline attains; on stiffness-graded 3D-printed TPU cubes it matches baseline grasp success at roughly half the grip force and cuts soft-object damage from $100\,\%$ to $40\,\%$.
AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。
--> [Submitted on 25 Aug 2026] Title:Sensorless damage-safe grasping View a PDF of the paper titled Sensorless damage-safe grasping, by Yusei Shuto and Danilo Vasconcellos Vargas View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Robotic fruit harvesting must hold produce securely without bruising it, yet compression stiffness varies several-fold with ripeness within a single species, so no fixed grip force spans the range. Rather than tune force, we bound deformation: a controller closes the gripper until the object's estimated compression strain reaches a user-specified limit $\varepsilon$, using only the encoder position and motor-effort signal on every servo gripper---no tactile or force-torque sensor. Dividing an effort-based contact force by a lower bound on object stiffness makes the stop provably conservative---true compression stays at or below $\varepsilon$---for any $\varepsilon$ above a contact-detection strain floor we identify and quantify: robust detection itself spends compression, linearly in closing speed, making speed an explicit throughput--gentleness knob. Unlike a hand-tuned force threshold, $\varepsilon$ is a certified, size-scaling, operator-interpretable damage limit, and a ready safe-action parameter for learned grasping policies. In MuJoCo simulation over a realistic fruit-stiffness range, under a sensor-noise model calibrated to the real servo, the controller holds $\ge 98\,\%$ grasp at $0\,\%$ damage across all medium-to-firm stiffnesses for the entire certified $\varepsilon$ range, which neither fixed-force baseline attains; on stiffness-graded 3D-printed TPU cubes it matches baseline grasp success at roughly half the grip force and cuts soft-object damage from $100\,\%$ to $40\,\%$. Subjects: Robotics (cs.RO) Cite as: arXiv:2608.23983 [cs.RO] (or arXiv:2608.23983v1 [cs.RO] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.23983 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Yusei Shuto [view email] [v1] Tue, 25 Aug 2026 02:24:08 UTC (1,037 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Sensorless damage-safe grasping, by Yusei Shuto and Danilo Vasconcellos Vargas View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.RO new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)