翻訳待ち：SciReC: Diagnostic Evaluation of Multimodal, Multi-Turn Relational Reasoning with Adaptive Interaction
AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。ソース概要：arXiv:2608.27461v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Relational reasoning requires the process of perceptual understanding, comparing, and integrating the underlying relationships between concepts. This ability consists of multiple categories, such as analogical, structural, and cause-effect, each capturing a different aspect of higher-order understanding. To examine the performance of multimodal large language models (MLLM) on these relational inference tasks, we developed SciReC, a model-adaptive multimodal academic dialog benchmark. As the relational reasoning process involves multiple representations and various factors (visual understanding, exhibiting knowledge, and memory recall), we propose DMRA, a deficit-based diagnostic framework that quantifies the contribution of these components to identify the primary cause of unsuccessful cases. Claude 4.6 achieved the best performance on the overall relational score with 73\%, followed by GPT 5.4 with 68\%. Performance trends indicate that open-source models achieve their lowest scores on spatial relations, while proprietary models struggle more with hierarchical and sequential relations. Across domains, model performance is lowest on Astronomy and highest on Psychology. The results of DMRA reveal that relational reasoning is the primary source of error across all models, followed by memory limitations.
AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。
--> [Submitted on 1 Jul 2026] Title:SciReC: Diagnostic Evaluation of Multimodal, Multi-Turn Relational Reasoning with Adaptive Interaction View a PDF of the paper titled SciReC: Diagnostic Evaluation of Multimodal, Multi-Turn Relational Reasoning with Adaptive Interaction, by Nilay Yilmaz and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Relational reasoning requires the process of perceptual understanding, comparing, and integrating the underlying relationships between concepts. This ability consists of multiple categories, such as analogical, structural, and cause-effect, each capturing a different aspect of higher-order understanding. To examine the performance of multimodal large language models (MLLM) on these relational inference tasks, we developed SciReC, a model-adaptive multimodal academic dialog benchmark. As the relational reasoning process involves multiple representations and various factors (visual understanding, exhibiting knowledge, and memory recall), we propose DMRA, a deficit-based diagnostic framework that quantifies the contribution of these components to identify the primary cause of unsuccessful cases. Claude 4.6 achieved the best performance on the overall relational score with 73\%, followed by GPT 5.4 with 68\%. Performance trends indicate that open-source models achieve their lowest scores on spatial relations, while proprietary models struggle more with hierarchical and sequential relations. Across domains, model performance is lowest on Astronomy and highest on Psychology. The results of DMRA reveal that relational reasoning is the primary source of error across all models, followed by memory limitations. Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2608.27461 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2608.27461v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.27461 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Nilay Yilmaz [view email] [v1] Wed, 1 Jul 2026 15:39:10 UTC (24,296 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled SciReC: Diagnostic Evaluation of Multimodal, Multi-Turn Relational Reasoning with Adaptive Interaction, by Nilay Yilmaz and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)