AI News HubLIVE
站内改写2 分钟阅读

待翻译:Risk-Aware Decision Policies for Agents Under Noisy Perception

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源摘要,待恢复后补全翻译:arXiv:2608.06420v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Perception in biological systems is inherently noisy, requiring organisms to make decisions under uncertainty where misclassification can be costly or fatal. We present an Artificial Life predator-prey model of foraging under noisy perception, and compare agent performance when using various policies that take into account their noisy predictions. Through controlled experiments under both symmetric and asymmetric perceptual noise, we show that blindly trusting perceptual labels leads to catastrophic failure as noise increases, while uncertainty-aware strategies significantly improve survival and reduce fatal errors. We further observe qualitative regime shifts in behaviour, with agents transitioning from exploratory to conservative strategies as uncertainty increases. Our model links risk-sensitive foraging, ecological information use, and Artificial Life by showing that explicit information gathering can improve robustness when perception is unreliable. These results highlight the importance of uncertainty-aware decision-making and provide an interpretable artificial life analogue to robust learning with noisy labels.

来源arXiv Machine Learning作者: David Szczecina

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源正文,待恢复后补全翻译。

--> [Submitted on 5 Aug 2026] Title:Risk-Aware Decision Policies for Agents Under Noisy Perception View a PDF of the paper titled Risk-Aware Decision Policies for Agents Under Noisy Perception, by David Szczecina View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Perception in biological systems is inherently noisy, requiring organisms to make decisions under uncertainty where misclassification can be costly or fatal. We present an Artificial Life predator-prey model of foraging under noisy perception, and compare agent performance when using various policies that take into account their noisy predictions. Through controlled experiments under both symmetric and asymmetric perceptual noise, we show that blindly trusting perceptual labels leads to catastrophic failure as noise increases, while uncertainty-aware strategies significantly improve survival and reduce fatal errors. We further observe qualitative regime shifts in behaviour, with agents transitioning from exploratory to conservative strategies as uncertainty increases. Our model links risk-sensitive foraging, ecological information use, and Artificial Life by showing that explicit information gathering can improve robustness when perception is unreliable. These results highlight the importance of uncertainty-aware decision-making and provide an interpretable artificial life analogue to robust learning with noisy labels. Comments: 8 pages, 6 figures. Submitted to the 2026 Conference on Artificial Life (ALIFE2026) Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) MSC classes: 68T37 ACM classes: I.2.11 Cite as: arXiv:2608.06420 [cs.LG] (or arXiv:2608.06420v1 [cs.LG] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.06420 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: David Szczecina [view email] [v1] Wed, 5 Aug 2026 18:15:21 UTC (1,171 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Risk-Aware Decision Policies for Agents Under Noisy Perception, by David Szczecina View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.LG new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) IArxiv recommender toggle IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)