跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:Reverse Item Response Theory for Sparsity-Robust Ranking in Fragmented Cancer Drug-Response Matrices

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2610.00002v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce reverse Item Response Theory (IRT) to pharmacogenomic drug-response analysis by treating cancer types as latent "subjects" with resistance ability and drugs as "items" with evasion difficulty. Applied to 242,036 drug sensitivity measurements from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC2) database, the model estimates cancer-type-level in-vitro resistance and drug-level broad activity on a shared latent scale. Validation across four missingness regimes demonstrates that reverse IRT better recovers the full-data latent ranking than simple averaging, with advantages of Delta-rho = +0.089 to +0.095 at 60% missingness under MCAR, cancer-biased, and drug-biased sparsity. Held-out prediction confirm…

來源arXiv Machine Learning作者: Jung Min Kang
待翻譯:Reverse Item Response Theory for Sparsity-Robust Ranking in Fragmented Cancer Drug-Response Matrices
回報錯誤

更正管道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 16 May 2026] Title:Reverse Item Response Theory for Sparsity-Robust Ranking in Fragmented Cancer Drug-Response Matrices View a PDF of the paper titled Reverse Item Response Theory for Sparsity-Robust Ranking in Fragmented Cancer Drug-Response Matrices, by Jung Min Kang View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:We introduce reverse Item Response Theory (IRT) to pharmacogenomic drug-response analysis by treating cancer types as latent "subjects" with resistance ability and drugs as "items" with evasion difficulty. Applied to 242,036 drug sensitivity measurements from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC2) database, the model estimates cancer-type-level in-vitro resistance and drug-level broad activity on a shared latent scale. Validation across four missingness regimes demonstrates that reverse IRT better recovers the full-data latent ranking than simple averaging, with advantages of Delta-rho = +0.089 to +0.095 at 60% missingness under MCAR, cancer-biased, and drug-biased sparsity. Held-out prediction confirms IRT achieves the best Brier score among five evaluated methods. Bootstrap confidence intervals show 19 of 28 cancer types have stable resistant/sensitive classifications. Cross-platform PRISM replication shows 82% directional agreement but weak rank-order correlation (rho = 0.25), indicating the contribution is methodological robustness under fragmented evaluation, not a universal clinical resistance leaderboard. Comments: 8 pages, 4 figures, 3 tables Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2610.00002 [cs.LG] (or arXiv:2610.00002v1 [cs.LG] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00002 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Jung Min Kang [view email] [v1] Sat, 16 May 2026 17:28:31 UTC (63 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Reverse Item Response Theory for Sparsity-Robust Ranking in Fragmented Cancer Drug-Response Matrices, by Jung Min Kang View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.LG new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) IArxiv recommender toggle IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

投資人進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級後設資料。
  • arXiv:2610.00002v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce reverse Item Response Theory (IRT) to pharmacogenomic drug-response analysis by treating cancer types as latent "subje…

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。