跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:QuanLing: Cross-Branch Validation of Language Distance Quantification on Western Romance

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2610.08851v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Quantifying language distance among closely related languages remains a core challenge in quantitative linguistics. Our previous work [1] introduced QuanLing (Quantitative Linguistics via Pretrained Language Models), a quantitative framework combining language distance metrics (sentence embedding distance, tokenization fragmentation rate) with language property analysis (MLM prediction probability), validated on North Germanic (Danish, Norwegian Bokm{\aa}l, Swedish). This paper extends QuanLing to Western Romance--French, Portuguese, Spanish, Italian--testing cross-branch applicability with the same metric family and aggregation protocol as our North Germanic study, adapted for four languages (English anchor, quad…

來源arXiv Computational Linguistics作者: Yiping Bai
待翻譯:QuanLing: Cross-Branch Validation of Language Distance Quantification on Western Romance
回報錯誤

更正管道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 3 Oct 2026] Title:QuanLing: Cross-Branch Validation of Language Distance Quantification on Western Romance View a PDF of the paper titled QuanLing: Cross-Branch Validation of Language Distance Quantification on Western Romance, by Yiping Bai View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Quantifying language distance among closely related languages remains a core challenge in quantitative linguistics. Our previous work [1] introduced QuanLing (Quantitative Linguistics via Pretrained Language Models), a quantitative framework combining language distance metrics (sentence embedding distance, tokenization fragmentation rate) with language property analysis (MLM prediction probability), validated on North Germanic (Danish, Norwegian Bokmål, Swedish). This paper extends QuanLing to Western Romance--French, Portuguese, Spanish, Italian--testing cross-branch applicability with the same metric family and aggregation protocol as our North Germanic study, adapted for four languages (English anchor, quadruplet construction). Using 150 four-language parallel sentences, we compute LaBSE sentence embedding distances, tokenization fragmentation rates from four monolingual BERT tokenizers, and mBERT masked language model mutual intelligibility. Results show that Portuguese--Spanish are closest (LaBSE distance 0.0229), French--Italian most distant (0.0338); LaBSE and mBERT rankings agree on 4 of 6 pairs, confirming cross-model robustness. Western Romance shows a wider absolute distance span than North Germanic (0.011 vs. 0.008) but comparable relative ratios (1.48 vs. 1.67), consistent with longer divergence time. French exhibits notably higher MLM predictability (36.12% top-1 accuracy vs. 29.28% for Italian), reflecting its orthography--phonology decoupling. This cross-branch validation provides further evidence for QuanLing's generalizability beyond a single language branch. Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2610.08851 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2610.08851v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.08851 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Yiping Bai [view email] [v1] Sat, 3 Oct 2026 03:11:29 UTC (526 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled QuanLing: Cross-Branch Validation of Language Distance Quantification on Western Romance, by Yiping Bai View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

工程師進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級後設資料。
  • arXiv:2610.08851v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Quantifying language distance among closely related languages remains a core challenge in quantitative linguistics. Our previous wo…

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。